News and views about philosophy, the academic profession, academic freedom, intellectual culture, and other topics. The world’s most popular philosophy blog, since 2003.
For what it’s worth, I agree. I have, with some trepidation, given it a bunch of my papers and asked…
Looking at some of the AI-amplified cranks on philpeople, it is hard to agree with the assessment of this article.…
Perhaps a useful distinction here is between replacing philosophers and changing the conditions under which philosophical work gets done. LLMs…
Conditional on the hypothesis that journal editors sometimes desk reject high-quality papers written and commended by world experts on a…
Some users seem to have conflicting impressions about the (absolute level of) abilities of current iterations of the LLMs. But…
One thing I appreciate about Greco’s piece is the very helpful distinction between instrumental and intrinsic value, which he lays…
At last, thanks to Professors Edelman and George at Vanderbilt, we have the answer! Professor Edelman writes:
We had to search by hand through
multiple data bases to track down co-authors of co-authors of Sunstein for our
project and we really need more eyes on the results to ensure that we got
everyone who belongs. We are hoping that the more people who look at the paper,
the more reliable the data will be.
E-mail Professor Edelman with corrections.
a018c375581bc13b896c90a94fa742ff
a018c375581bc13b896c90a94fa742ff
I respond to this report here https://jasonstanleyantifascist.substack.com/p/on-the-philosophical-muddle-that