Leiter Reports: A Philosophy Blog

News and views about philosophy, the academic profession, academic freedom, intellectual culture, and other topics. The world’s most popular philosophy blog, since 2003.

  1. Giovanni Molteni Tagliabue's avatar
  2. Fabien Muller's avatar
  3. Saul Smilansky's avatar
  4. Dan Dennis's avatar

    Some background: https://www.theguardian.com/education/2026/may/12/thousands-of-university-of-nottingham-staff-told-they-are-at-risk-of-redundancy Not only does Nottingham University have a good academic reputation, the city of Nottingham has a great…

  5. Jacob Barrett's avatar

Jurisprudence

  • Most cited legal philosophers by D-Index according to research.com (CORRECTED & UPDATED)

    We’ve noted the “D-index” (an h-index for discipline-specific journals) calculated by research.com previously. (Their rankings of universities in law are pretty silly, since the faculty lists include deceasd faculty, retired faculty, and faculty who are not law professors.) They clearly don’t count law reviews for D-index, only faculty-edited journals, which is appropriate for legal philosophy.…

    Read more

  • Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Law, volume 6 will be published…

    …in May 2026 (not January 2027 as the website still says), with new essays by Hasan Dindjer (Oxford), Amanda Greene (UC Santa Barbara), Gabe Mendlow (Michigan), Sophia Moreau (NYU), James Penner (NUS), Ralf Poscher (Freiburg), Sabine Tsuruda (Toronto), and Daniel Viehoff (Berkeley), and covering a wide range of topics in general and normative (or specific)…

    Read more

  • Someone once described SCOTUS as a “super-legislature”…

    …and the recent NYT expose about the origin of SCOTUS’s “shadow docket” suggests he was right. As one reader put it to me in an email about the NYT article: Ultimate vindication of your “super legislature” moniker. Nothing in the story is particularly surprising, but it does establish that what we call the “shadow docket”…

    Read more

  • “General jurisprudence” in U.S. law schools

    Anyone working in legal philosophy who has spent time in Europe or other civil law countries (especially) is aware that most law faculties there typically have entire departments of jurisprudence, with multiple faculty. The historical explanation for this enviable state of affairs is no doubt complex, although the huge influence of Hans Kelsen, the Austrian…

    Read more

  • “From a Realist Point of View” exists!

    (UPDATE: Amazon is currently selling the hardcover at an 18% discount [I don’t know why, but I’m not complaining!] I received my copies the other day here in Chicago. More information. A couple of devoted souls even bought it on Amazon (despite the price!). (It was ranked about 8 million a week ago.) My thanks!…

    Read more

  • More on recent “grounding” formulations of legal positivism that exclude Hans Kelsen

    Scott Shapiro did the most to popularize a misleading way of describing legal positivism. (The mistake derives from Greenberg and Gideon Rosen, but Shapiro’s 2011 book helped make it common among American legal philosophers, most of whom are not burdened by knowing anything about the history of the subject and, in many cases, have never…

    Read more

  • My legal philosophy blog is coming back to life…

    …here, stimulated partly by the advanced class in general jurisprudence I’m teaching this quarter (readings from Dickson, Dworkin, Enoch, Leiter, Toh, Kelsen, Atiq and others). Readers interested in legal philosophy may find some of the posts of interest.

    Read more

  • Muhammad Ali Khalidi and Liam Murphy (hereafter K&M) on “Disagreement about the kind law”

    This paper by K&M appeared in Jurisprudence 12 (2021): 1-16. The main contribution of the paper is in section 4, which argues, quite plausibly, for the view that law is dependent on (at least some) people having the concept of law. This is a significant improvement on a related point that Alex Langlinais and I…

    Read more

  • Kelsen and “grounding” versions of legal positivism

    The current American fad (which I write about critically in Chapter 9 of my forthcoming book) of characterizing legal positivism as the view that “legal facts are grounded in social facts” has as one of its many ironies that the other major 20th-century legal positivist, Hans Kelsen, rejects it (Hart as I argue, does not…

    Read more

  • The study of philosophy in law schools, and JD/PhD programs, 2025 edition

    Some terminology:  by “general jurisprudence,” I mean the core philosophical questions about the nature of law, the relationship between law and morality, and the nature of legal reasoning; by “normative [or “specific”] jurisprudence,” I mean the myriad philosophical attempts to make normative sense (or provide normative rationalizations) of different substantive areas of law, like torts,…

    Read more

  • “From a Realist Point of View”: coming in March

    That’s Thucydides on the cover! Readers will know some of the distinguished scholars kindly endorsing the book, but may not know the first two: Michel Troper is the preeminent French legal realist, who also introduced legal philosophy to French legal education in the 1970s (and was, I learned, a visiting professor here at Chicago a…

    Read more

  • Harvard student newspaper profiles Adrian Vermeule…

    ….but manages never to note that his feeble book Common-Good Constitutionalism (aptly dubbed “Twitter constitutionalism” by some colleagues) is full of jurisprudential claims that are either mistaken or unargued for. Vermeule’s repeated reference to “the classical tradition” is a reference to something that does not exist.

    Read more

  • ABA Council on Legal Education ignores critics, offers no substantive responses, and says “full speed ahead” with disrupting legal education at most of the nation’s law schools

    I take it that's the upshot of this.  The contempt for law schools and legal educators in this memo is palpable, given the devastating (and still unanswered) criticisms of the proposal to double experiential credit hours required for graduation.  The two small concessions are:  (1) the Council now recommends that 3 of the 12 required…

    Read more

  • “From a Realist Point of View” now delivered to the press and should be out in Spring 2026…

    …in the "Oxford Legal Philosophy" series.  Here's the official OUP blurb: From A Realist Point of View combines new essays with revised versions of the most important recent work of preeminent legal realist Brian Leiter. This collection offers a systematic and philosophically ambitious account of legal realism and links it, for the first time, to…

    Read more

  • “Against the Metaphysical Turn in Recent American Jurisprudence”

    A new paper that may be of interest to those who follow literature in jurisprudence; it will appear in my forthcoming book, From a Realist Point of View (Oxford University Press, 2026), which will include previously published papers (some revised a lot), plus new material (including this chapter), all related to realism in legal and…

    Read more

Designed with WordPress