I do appreciate that the ABA Journal has listed this blog two years in a row among its 'top 100' law-related blogs, especially since the ABA Journal link directs a decent amount of traffic here. I am always amazed at how many of the blawgs on their list I've never heard of, and perhaps just a tad dismayed at how bad some of the blawgs are that they do list–but to each his own! If it weren't a slow news day, I wouldn't even post this notice, but, alas, no real news today!
In any case, my thanks to the ABA Journal for the continued link and exposure.
UPDATE: I guess if I thought any of this mattered, I would do this. But I don't. So don't bother. Just keep reading. Thanks.




To be worth using, a detector needs not only (A) not get very many false positives, but also (B) get…