They include current law professors: Kenneth Abraham (Virginia), John J. Donohue III (Yale), Deborah Hensler (Stanford), Michael Klarman (Harvard), Deborah Rhode (Stanford), and Mark Roe (Harvard)–as well as former law professors Ronald Daniels (now President of Johns Hopkins, formerly at Penn and Toronto), Theodor Meron (now emeritus at NYU, currently serving on the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia), and Judge J. Harvie Wilkinson III of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit. Regarding the AAAS, and some of its sins of omission, see this earlier discussion.
Leiter Reports: A Philosophy Blog
News and views about philosophy, the academic profession, academic freedom, intellectual culture, and other topics. The world’s most popular philosophy blog, since 2003.
The discussion here assumes an institutional context where returning to supervised in-person assessment is at least theoretically feasible, a reasonable…
Cyber security professional here -reliably determining when a computational artifact (file, etc.) was created is *hard*. This is sorta why…
Agreed with the other commentator. It is extremely unlikely that Pangram’s success is due to its cheating by reading metadata.
I see this question as a bit naïve. There is metadata on every document created by a modern word processor…
There’s a simple way to test. Open a pre-2022 essay and copy-and-paste it into a new file.
At the risk of self-advertising:… You claim “AI is unusual in degree, not in kind” and “It is not clear…
Everything you say is true, but what is the alternative? I don’t think people are advocating a return to in-class…