News and views about philosophy, the academic profession, academic freedom, intellectual culture, and other topics. The world’s most popular philosophy blog, since 2003.
For what it’s worth, I agree. I have, with some trepidation, given it a bunch of my papers and asked…
Looking at some of the AI-amplified cranks on philpeople, it is hard to agree with the assessment of this article.…
Perhaps a useful distinction here is between replacing philosophers and changing the conditions under which philosophical work gets done. LLMs…
Conditional on the hypothesis that journal editors sometimes desk reject high-quality papers written and commended by world experts on a…
Some users seem to have conflicting impressions about the (absolute level of) abilities of current iterations of the LLMs. But…
One thing I appreciate about Greco’s piece is the very helpful distinction between instrumental and intrinsic value, which he lays…
"Persuasive Authorities" and "Computational Legal Studies."
AND YET A THIRD from Stephen Ellmann (New York Law School). And with that, I'm going to have to declare a moratorium on such announcements, lest I be deluged with requests to do so. But I may still link to particular posts or blog of special interest to readers of this blog.
I respond to this report here https://jasonstanleyantifascist.substack.com/p/on-the-philosophical-muddle-that