So in Canada, a civilized country, they ask someone who actually knows something to design law school rankings: no self-reported data, no room for fraud, and the emphasis is wholly on the quality of the faculty and the outcomes for graduates. I would have liked them to do some things differently, but overall it's not a travesty. It's also not hugely controversial, for obvious reasons. Bob Morse, please take note!
Leiter Reports: A Philosophy Blog
News and views about philosophy, the academic profession, academic freedom, intellectual culture, and other topics. The world’s most popular philosophy blog, since 2003.
There is a slippery inference from the premise that we have struggled to converge on important philosophical truths to the…
I can corroborate Jason’s remarks about the UW System’s implementation of post-tenure review. In part because I was a participant…
The Wisconsin legislature made UW system implement post-tenure (5-year) reviews several years ago. The statutory requirements were fed into the…
Sorry, this may be a bit off topic, but if done well, I would really welcome some equivalent of a…
Isn’t one of the problems in this interesting converation how we define “philosophy”? Is philosophy just what is taught and…
I don’t think I misread the paper. Its lament is clear. (It’s a good paper, in style and substance, even…
I would note that there are a lot of structural reasons why senior staff might produce less research than people…