News and views about philosophy, the academic profession, academic freedom, intellectual culture, and other topics. The world’s most popular philosophy blog, since 2003.
Surely no LLM writes as badly as Hegel!
If the annoying tendency to list things in threes is a tell-tale sign, then surely Hegel’s Encyclopedia Logic and much…
I don’t think we’d want to do just any subject in philosophy for such a test, as many incoming undergrads…
Sometime DGS of a terminal MA program here. This is something we have been thinking very carefully about. So far…
When I entered graduate school in literature in 1969, we had to sit down with a dictionary and a pen…
There are no good arguments, in an educational environment, for distinguishing between student submissions which are AI-generated and those which…
Things might have changed since I last checked, but out of curiosity, about a year ago, I fed various bits…
…as compiled by Time magazine using various data sources. Here are the philosophers who made the list (with their rank):
8. Aristotle
14. Marx
25. Plato
42. Nietzsche
59. Kant
64. Voltaire
68. Socrates
72. Augustine
79. Cicero
80. Rousseau
81. Francis Bacon
90. Aquinas
92. Descartes
100. Locke
Aristotle ahead of Plato must surely have to do with Aristotle’s affect on Aquinas and Catholicism. But the top five philosophers on this list seems right: Plato, Aristotle, Kant, Marx, Nietzsche!
Looking at the world today, I’d eliminate Locke and Voltaire from the list and add Hobbes and Machiavelli.
I understand that their methodology is inherently Anglo-centric and far from perfect, but really: Elvis was more significant than Mao, who did not even make the list?
that 20th century thinkers didnt make the list is no surprise, I guess. But interesting no adam smith or j.s. mill, and also no confucius or lao tse.
Adam Smith is in the list, 56!
I found it interesting that Jesus and Muhammad were included but not Abraham. At first I thought that perhaps that was because no one knows if he was a real person but then I see that King Arthur is also on the list and he also has not been confirmed to have existed.
I take it that such lists have two primary functions: 1. They gratify the narcissism of soi-disant educated folks who skim them and are pleased that they recognize all the names; and 2. They generate ‘clicks’ and disagreement (What?? They didn’t include X (= Mao or Walt Disney or Louis Armstrong or Ernesto Guevara or . . . ) I was pleased to see that the long-suffering Ali made the list at 89, but mystified that they didn’t include Master Kong (aka the noted social philosopher Confucius). And I really don’t want to think about metrics that rank George W. Bush well ahead of the prominent philosopher and sage of the Shakyas Siddhartha Gautama . . . Given the recent turns in politics, one might want to include de Maistre and Gobineau.
56 Adam Smith. Was he not a philosopher?
Leave a Reply