I made some judgment calls, like treating Wittgenstein’s classic work as part of “Anglophone” philosophy of language; treating books that straddle philosophy of language and mind as belonging here; and largely excluding the kind of work professional linguists do, even when it is of interest to philosophers of language. (Chomsky is a tricky case, but based on feedback from various philosophers of language, I have included one Chomsky book that is most clearly philosophical. Obviously his linguistics work is of great importance for many philosophers of language.) I list only books with at least 3,000 citations (rounded to the nearest 100, as before). Corrections welcome, as always.
- J.L. Austin, How to Do Things with Words, 85,200
- Ludwig Wittgenstein, Philosophical Investigations, 76,300
- John Searle, Speech Acts, 44,400
- Saul Kripke, Naming and Necessity, 21,300
- W.V.O. Quine, Word and Object, 18,500
- John Searle, Expression and Meaning, 11,400
- David Lewis, Convention, 11,000
- Robert Brandom, Making it Explicit, 8,700
- W.V.O. Quine, From a Logical Point of View, 8,600
- Gareth Evans, The Varieties of Reference, 8,200
- Donald Davidson, Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation, 7,400
- W.V.O. Quine, Ontological Relativity and Other Essays, 6,900
- Saul Kripke, Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language, 6,800
- Jon Barwise & John Perry, Situations and Attitudes, 6,600
- Michael Dummett, Frege: Philosophy of Language, 5,600
- Kent Bach & Robert M. Harnish, Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts, 5,000
- H. Paul Grice, Studies in the Way of Words, 4,600
- Noam Chomsky, New Horizons in the Study of Language and Mind,4,300
- Hilary Putnam, Mind, Language, and Reality, 4,200
- Robert Brandom, Articulating Reasons, 3,400
- J.L. Austin, Philosophical Papers, 3,400
- Hilary Putnam, Representation and Reality, 3,300
- Michael Dummett, Truth and Other Enigmas, 3,200




For sure. Re-discovering Leibniz ; reinventing the wheel perhaps. This is why philosophy requires understanding the history of philosophy. I…