Even the Fox “News” [sic] legal commentator thinks it is absurd.
News and views about philosophy, the academic profession, academic freedom, intellectual culture, and other topics. The world’s most popular philosophy blog, since 2003.
I feel obligated to push back on some parts of this post a little bit… To be clear about where…
According to Pangram 4.0, 100% of this text is AI-generated. For comparison, I’ve sampled a number of comments (including the…
Some think I have been too harsh; that I must have “screwed up,” if I’ve concluded that so many “professionally…
The existence of disagreement isn’t proof truth hasn’t been established. There are people who dispute all kinds of well-established truths,…
Without prejudice to other threads in Dan Kaufman’s statement, it seems premature to say that real or hypothetical AI systems…
He writes: “A startling number of our colleagues have thereby betrayed that they have no idea what our subject is…
Even the Fox “News” [sic] legal commentator thinks it is absurd.
Isn’t there a philosophical tradition, explicit in Socrates, that one’s understanding of ethical issues is deeper if one thinks them…