Leiter Reports: A Philosophy Blog

News and views about philosophy, the academic profession, academic freedom, intellectual culture, and other topics. The world’s most popular philosophy blog, since 2003.

  1. Daniel Greco's avatar

    With GRE scores we can quantify the extent to which minorities, women, and lower-income applicants do worse than majorities, men,…

  2. Mark's avatar
  3. Frederick Choo's avatar
  4. Brian Leiter's avatar
  5. Nick Perry's avatar
  6. faculty at lower-ranked but competitive program's avatar

    We haven’t discussed this in our department (lower ranked PGR but tend to get highly competitive/very large applicant pool) but…

  7. Binary choice's avatar

    If you were the head recruiter for a professional basketball team, would you require height and weight measurements for prospective…

How long should academic job candidates have to consider a tenure-track offer?

This question has an easy answer: one month is reasonable, two weeks is absurdly unreasonable, and anything less than a month should be justified by some pressing consideration, e.g., it’s late in the season and the school must fill this curricular slot. Schools that give open-ended offers, without a deadline, are a blessing for candidates, of course, but many schools cannot afford to do that: they need to be able to move on to other candidates.

Schools that give two weeks for a decision are usually trying to preempt competitors by forcing a candidate to decide before the hiring process plays out elsewhere. In nearly thirty years of working with law teaching candidates, I’ve never seen this strategy work out well for the hiring school. Sure, they sometimes force the risk-adverse candidate to accept the offer, but that starts the professional relationship in a bad way, and almost always the candidate leaves within a few years–often to schools that were considering the candidate originally.

So Deans: be reasonable. Aim to give candidates a month, and at a minimum, three weeks.

, ,

Designed with WordPress