Leiter Reports: A Philosophy Blog

News and views about philosophy, the academic profession, academic freedom, intellectual culture, and other topics. The world’s most popular philosophy blog, since 2003.

  1. Justin Fisher's avatar

    To be worth using, a detector needs not only (A) not get very many false positives, but also (B) get…

  2. Mark's avatar

    Everything you say is true, but what is the alternative? I don’t think people are advocating a return to in-class…

  3. Deirdre Anne's avatar
  4. Keith Douglas's avatar

    Cyber security professional here -reliably determining when a computational artifact (file, etc.) was created is *hard*. This is sorta why…

  5. sahpa's avatar

    Agreed with the other commentator. It is extremely unlikely that Pangram’s success is due to its cheating by reading metadata.

  6. Deirdre Anne's avatar
  7. Mark's avatar

The Problem of Evil Solved at Last

I’m delighted to see this brilliant paper by my friend Ken Gemes (Birkbeck College, London) is now available on-line. The core idea:

“[C]onsider the world we know and inhabit. It is a possible world, hence one that God has thought of. Furthermore, our world pretty clearly, pace Descartes, contains evil. Now God being perfect would not create a world containing evil. Ergo God did not create this world, he merely thought of it. Our world then is a merely possible world, one God thought of but chose not to create. Presumably it was his knowledge of the evil in this world which led him to decide that it was beneath creation. The actual world is some other world that contains none of the evil of this world or any other possible world.”

Not everyone, admittedly, may like the solution, but I’m convinced it’s the only one in the offing, absent rejection of some other premise that those exercised by the problem typically want to retain.

UPDATE: Alan Carter (University of Colorado at Boulder) asks: “Does this mean that good people in this world don’t really go to heaven? God just thought they do.” (By the way, since a few philosophers have e-mailed with counter-arguments, rest assured this posting was done for humorous intent: everyone knows no philosophical problems can be solved!)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Designed with WordPress