…but will we know the results in the year 2004? Given what’s brewing, it’s doubtful.
Thanks! Turns out I got fooled by AI detector, a company using the name “Pangram” for advertising. A check with…
News and views about philosophy, the academic profession, academic freedom, intellectual culture, and other topics. The world’s most popular philosophy blog, since 2003.
Thanks! Turns out I got fooled by AI detector, a company using the name “Pangram” for advertising. A check with…
I have solved complex math problems without any ‘inner speech’. Having solved a problem, one may then translate the solution…
If so, provide a copy to Pangram’s CEO, who has offered a bounty for any long form text from before…
Hurlburt has a pretty cool answer to your question. You think that conscious thought requires ‘inner speech’. This is because…
Can I ask a question which seems pertinent? What does it mean to engage or not engage in inner speech?…
Very interesting! Here’s what Hurlburt claims in the linked video: Percentage of people who engage in ‘inner speech’ *occasionally*: ~…
Speaking as a linguist working in this area, Russell Hurlburt is very well known in the field as having pioneered…
…but will we know the results in the year 2004? Given what’s brewing, it’s doubtful.
Leave a Reply