Leiter Reports: A Philosophy Blog

News and views about philosophy, the academic profession, academic freedom, intellectual culture, and other topics. The world’s most popular philosophy blog, since 2003.

  1. Justin Fisher's avatar

    To be worth using, a detector needs not only (A) not get very many false positives, but also (B) get…

  2. Mark's avatar

    Everything you say is true, but what is the alternative? I don’t think people are advocating a return to in-class…

  3. Deirdre Anne's avatar
  4. Keith Douglas's avatar

    Cyber security professional here -reliably determining when a computational artifact (file, etc.) was created is *hard*. This is sorta why…

  5. sahpa's avatar

    Agreed with the other commentator. It is extremely unlikely that Pangram’s success is due to its cheating by reading metadata.

  6. Deirdre Anne's avatar
  7. Mark's avatar

How *Not* to Write about Phenomenology

Taylor Carman (Philosophy, Barnard/Columbia) has instructive things to say about a recent, not very satisfactory book on Merleau-Ponty.  Many of the faults Professor Carman finds in the book under review–e.g., "These sentences [from the book] seem to be spinning their wheels, repeating and recasting Merleau-Ponty’s jargon, rather than advancing our understanding of either the texts or the things themselves"–could be generalized to other scholarly writing one often encounters on post-Kantian German and French philosophers.  We are, happily, living in a golden age for English-speaking scholarship on post-Kantian philosophy, though, alas, a lot of obscure and philosophically superficial work still appears.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Designed with WordPress