Leiter Reports: A Philosophy Blog

News and views about philosophy, the academic profession, academic freedom, intellectual culture, and other topics. The world’s most popular philosophy blog, since 2003.

  1. Ryan Mitchell Wittingslow's avatar
  2. Jason Stanley's avatar
  3. Daniel Greco's avatar
  4. Nobody's avatar
  5. Roger of Invisible America's avatar
  6. Santa Monica's avatar
  7. Optimistic about LLM's avatar

The Philosophy of the Future

The future of philosophy may be the philosophy of the future, if Nick Bostrom (Oxford, Philosophy) has anything to say about it.  He directs the Oxford Future of Humanity Institute, which is a part of the University of Oxford’s recently founded James Martin 21st Century School.  "The Institute will focus on the fundamental question: which parts of
the transhuman vision are worth achieving, and what is the best way to
go about it?"  The "transhuman vision" is one that regards human nature not as a datum but as a plastic something that technology now enables us to shape and extend in ways not imagined by philosophers of the great traditions.

The vision has its own organization, the World Transhumanist Association, and may soon even have its own professionally designed logo.  As one might imagine, the details of this vision are very much constested, but the agreed core supports "the development of and access to new technologies that enable everyone to enjoy better minds, better bodies, and better lives. In other words, we want people to be better than well."  So, we have a future for philosophy and a philosophy for the future: what could be better?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

One response to “The Philosophy of the Future”

  1. The center purports to want both to advance access to new technologies, and to support their further development. However, most of the transhumanist material I've read is devoted only to the latter goal. You have to make some pretty heroic assumptions about technological diffusion to assume the two goals are congruent. I raise some doubts in my piece "Two Concepts of Immortality," 14 Yale J. L. & Humanities 73 (2001).

Designed with WordPress