News and views about philosophy, the academic profession, academic freedom, intellectual culture, and other topics. The world’s most popular philosophy blog, since 2003.
Cyber security professional here -reliably determining when a computational artifact (file, etc.) was created is *hard*. This is sorta why…
Agreed with the other commentator. It is extremely unlikely that Pangram’s success is due to its cheating by reading metadata.
I see this question as a bit naïve. There is metadata on every document created by a modern word processor…
There’s a simple way to test. Open a pre-2022 essay and copy-and-paste it into a new file.
At the risk of self-advertising:… You claim “AI is unusual in degree, not in kind” and “It is not clear…
Apropos of Sagar’s wish to foist the A.I. industry by its own petard, this article appeared in print in yesterday’s…
I teach both large courses, like Jurisprudence and Critical Legal Thinking (a.k.a Legal Argumentation), and small seminar-based courses at Edinburgh…
Here's a great new resource for Nietzsche scholars. Are there similar on-line resources for other major philosophers? Please post links in the comments section. Submit comments only once, they may take awhile to appear.
There is something a bit like this for George Herbert Mead, and a whole host of philosophers, psychologists, and social thinkers related to him:
http://www.brocku.ca/MeadProject/
It is a fairly useful resource for those working in history of American philosophy and early psychology & social theory.
The Marxist Internet Archive has all kinds of materials from Marx and Engels and a wide variety of people who called themselves Marxists:
For Darwin: http://darwin-online.org.uk/
Everything Aquinas ever wrote, with a handy search function and bibliography of secondary literature: http://www.corpusthomisticum.org/
Leave a Reply to Daniel Brunson Cancel reply