Leiter Reports: A Philosophy Blog

News and views about philosophy, the academic profession, academic freedom, intellectual culture, and other topics. The world’s most popular philosophy blog, since 2003.

  1. Keith Douglas's avatar

    Cyber security professional here -reliably determining when a computational artifact (file, etc.) was created is *hard*. This is sorta why…

  2. sahpa's avatar

    Agreed with the other commentator. It is extremely unlikely that Pangram’s success is due to its cheating by reading metadata.

  3. Deirdre Anne's avatar
  4. Mark's avatar
  5. Mark Robert Taylor's avatar

    At the risk of self-advertising:… You claim “AI is unusual in degree, not in kind” and “It is not clear…

  6. F.E. Guerra-Pujol's avatar

    Apropos of Sagar’s wish to foist the A.I. industry by its own petard, this article appeared in print in yesterday’s…

  7. Claudio's avatar

    I teach both large courses, like Jurisprudence and Critical Legal Thinking (a.k.a Legal Argumentation), and small seminar-based courses at Edinburgh…

A Poll: What is the best way to evaluate the *scholarly* quality of a law faculty?

Is it through scholarly impact/citation studies (like this one)?  Or reputational surveys (such as here or here)?  Or SSRN downloads (e.g., here)?  Or is there no reliable way to gauge this?  Take the poll.

UPDATE:  A comment from a reader leads me to realize that I should emphasize that you should please interpret the categories broadly:  so, e.g., "scholarly impact/citation studies" doesn't commit one to my way of doing them–it could include impact/citation studies that used different databases, that included books, Google scholar, etc.  Similarly, a reputational survey needn't mean the way US News does them, but could include a survey in which experts are asked to evaluate recent work by colleagues and give their assessment of it.

One response to “A Poll: What is the best way to evaluate the *scholarly* quality of a law faculty?”

  1. Ranking Faculty Quality

    Brian Leiter posts: Is it through scholarly impact/citation studies (like this one)? Or reputational surveys (such as here or here)? Or SSRN downloads (e.g., here)? Or is there no reliable way to gauge this? Take the poll. UPDATE: A comment from a read…

Designed with WordPress