Leiter Reports: A Philosophy Blog

News and views about philosophy, the academic profession, academic freedom, intellectual culture, and other topics. The world’s most popular philosophy blog, since 2003.

  1. Claudio's avatar

    I teach both large courses, like Jurisprudence and Critical Legal Thinking (a.k.a Legal Argumentation), and small seminar-based courses at Edinburgh…

  2. Charles Pigden's avatar

    Surely there is an answer to the problem of AI cheating which averts the existential threat. . It’s not great,…

  3. Mark's avatar

    I’d like to pose a question. Let’s be pessimistic for the moment, and assume AI *does* destroy the university, at…

  4. A in the UK's avatar
  5. Jonathan Turner's avatar

    I agree with all of this. The threat is really that stark. The only solution is indeed in-class essay exams,…

  6. Craig Duncan's avatar
  7. Ludovic's avatar

    My big problem with LLMs at the present time, apart from being potentially the epitome of Foucault’s panopticon & Big…

A Condorcet Ranking of Philosophy Departments

The real PGR surveys will be getting underway in a few weeks, but I thought it might be interesting (or at least amusing) to see how the top 20 U.S. departments get ranked using the Condorcet system.  Internet polls are fraught with obvious problems, but the Condorcet system often does amazingly well at undermining strategic voting and the like.  I've listed 34 programs, based partly on 2009 results, and partly on changes in the interim.   Have fun!  Bear in mind that voters who have the most impact on the final results are those who take the time to rank all the options.

UPDATE (SEPTEMBER 9):  So with about 550 votes cast, here's the 'top 20' (which has been fairly stable now for awhile):

1. New York University  (Condorcet winner: wins contests with all other choices)
2. Rutgers University, New Brunswick  loses to New York University by 309–133
3. Princeton University  loses to New York University by 350–104, loses to Rutgers University, New Brunswick by 253–198
4. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor  loses to New York University by 400–58, loses to Princeton University by 345–108
5. Massachussetts Institute of Technology  loses to New York University by 398–58, loses to University of Michigan, Ann Arbor by 223–219
6. University of Pittsburgh  loses to New York University by 400–67, loses to Massachussetts Institute of Technology by 242–204
7. Harvard University  loses to New York University by 387–71, loses to University of Pittsburgh by 236–210
8. Stanford University  loses to New York University by 421–40, loses to Harvard University by 272–166
9. Yale University  loses to New York University by 422–40, loses to Stanford University by 223–209
10. University of California, Berkeley  loses to New York University by 415–54, loses to Yale University by 222–217
11. University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill  loses to New York University by 429–30, loses to University of California, Berkeley by 235–193
12. Cornell University  loses to New York University by 421–41, loses to University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill by 242–189
13. University of California, Los Angeles  loses to New York University by 432–25, loses to Cornell University by 223–207
14. Columbia University  loses to New York University by 426–40, loses to University of California, Los Angeles by 218–210
15. City University of New York Graduate Center  loses to New York University by 424–41, loses to Columbia University by 238–177
16. University of Arizona  loses to New York University by 431–29, loses to City University of New York Graduate Center by 221–203
17. University of Southern California  loses to New York University by 439–22, loses to University of Arizona by 238–166
18. Brown University  loses to New York University by 426–32, loses to University of Southern California by 207–198
19. University of Chicago  loses to New York University by 415–48, loses to Brown University by 240–178
20. University of Notre Dame  loses to New York University by 433–31, loses to University of Chicago by 217–188
Runner-up:   University of Texas, Austin  loses to New York University by 436–19, loses to University of Notre Dame by 221–173

It's interesting that these results aren't crazy, even if one might quibble (MIT too high; Pitt, UNC, UCLA, Columbia, Arizona too low etc.); the Condorcet method produces fewer ties.   One suspects 'halo' effects were doing some work here, but we'll see how the PGR survey results compare in a couple of months.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Designed with WordPress