Leiter Reports: A Philosophy Blog

News and views about philosophy, the academic profession, academic freedom, intellectual culture, and other topics. The world’s most popular philosophy blog, since 2003.

  1. Justin Fisher's avatar

    To be worth using, a detector needs not only (A) not get very many false positives, but also (B) get…

  2. Mark's avatar

    Everything you say is true, but what is the alternative? I don’t think people are advocating a return to in-class…

  3. Deirdre Anne's avatar
  4. Keith Douglas's avatar

    Cyber security professional here -reliably determining when a computational artifact (file, etc.) was created is *hard*. This is sorta why…

  5. sahpa's avatar

    Agreed with the other commentator. It is extremely unlikely that Pangram’s success is due to its cheating by reading metadata.

  6. Deirdre Anne's avatar
  7. Mark's avatar

What’s actually going on at Suffolk Law?

Brian Leiter

Various blogs picked up on a brief, and unsourced, line in a longer story about Suffolk University to the effect that all tenured faculty were being offered buy-outs.  All the tenured faculty?  Really?  I can imagine that like a number of schools seriously affected by declines in enrollments, retirement incentives and/or buy-outs are being made available, but it's hard to see the sense in buying out all your tenured faculty.  If someone from Suffolk would like to confirm or clarify, I'm opening comments for that purpose.  Please include a valid e-mail address (which will not appear).

, ,

Leave a Reply to Jim Milles Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

2 responses to “What’s actually going on at Suffolk Law?”

  1. Jim Milles

    I don’t have any inside info on Suffolk, but I’m somewhat skeptical of the “buyout” language. I’ve seen other institutions offer tepid “retirement incentives” that have been wrongly described in the press as “buyouts.”

    Reply
  2. Bob Bohrer

    It is more likely be an offer to all of the group, with an express limit on the number that can accept and the priority among applicants. That is different than an offer to the group with the intent or understanding that all can accept the offer.

    Reply

Designed with WordPress