Leiter Reports: A Philosophy Blog

News and views about philosophy, the academic profession, academic freedom, intellectual culture, and other topics. The world’s most popular philosophy blog, since 2003.

  1. Justin Fisher's avatar

    To be worth using, a detector needs not only (A) not get very many false positives, but also (B) get…

  2. Mark's avatar

    Everything you say is true, but what is the alternative? I don’t think people are advocating a return to in-class…

  3. Deirdre Anne's avatar
  4. Keith Douglas's avatar

    Cyber security professional here -reliably determining when a computational artifact (file, etc.) was created is *hard*. This is sorta why…

  5. sahpa's avatar

    Agreed with the other commentator. It is extremely unlikely that Pangram’s success is due to its cheating by reading metadata.

  6. Deirdre Anne's avatar
  7. Mark's avatar

More PGR 2014: Top Programs in “Early Modern Philosophy: 17th Century”

Brit and I delivered today the specialty rankings to Wiley-Blackwell; the rankings will go live at www.philosophicalgourmet.com starting around December 10. 

Here is what a full specialty ranking will look like, in this case for Early Modern Philosophy:  17th Century.  Recall schools are ranked by their rounded mean scores, and after the school names we list the median and mode.  After the list of ranked programs are a list of other programs recommended by members of the Advisory Board, in some cases after being nominated by evaluators.

EARLY MODERN PHILOSOPHY: 17th CENTURY

Group 1 (1)  (rounded mean of 4.5)

Yale University (4.5, 5)

Group 2 (2-5)  (rounded mean of 4.0)

Harvard University (4, 4)

New York University (4.5, 4.5)

Princeton University (4, 4.5 & 4)

University of California, San Diego (4, 4)

Group 3 (6-12) (rounded mean of 3.5)

Rutgers University, New Brunswick (3.5, 4)

University of California, Los Angeles (4, 4)

University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (3.5, 3.5)

University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill  (3.75, 4)

University of Notre Dame (3.5, 3.5 & 3)

University of Toronto (3.75, 4)

University of Wisconsin, Madison (3.5, 3.5)

Group 4 (13-24) (rounded mean of 3.0)

Birkbeck College, University of London (3, 3)

Columbia University (3.5, 4)

Johns Hopkins University (3, 3)

King’s College, London (3, 3.5)

Ohio State University (3.5, 3.5)

Oxford University (3, 3)

Purdue University (3, 3)

University of Pennsylvania (3.5, 3.5)

University of Southern California (3, 3 & 4)

University of Virginia (3.5, 3.5)

University of Western Ontario (3, 3.5 & 3)

Washington University, St. Louis (3, 3 & 2)

Additional programs not evaluated this year but recommended for consideration by the Advisory Board:

Simon Fraser University

University of Kentucky

University of South Florida

Evaluators:  Roger Ariew, John Carriero, Andrew Chignell, Michael Della Rocca, Lisa Downing, Daniel Garber, Don Garrett, Michael Gill, Dan Kaufman, Michael LeBuffe, Martin Lin, Antonia LoLordo, Yitzhak Melamed, John Morrison, Alan Nelson, Eric Schliesser, Eric Watkins, Kenneth Winkler.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Designed with WordPress