Leiter Reports: A Philosophy Blog

News and views about philosophy, the academic profession, academic freedom, intellectual culture, and other topics. The world’s most popular philosophy blog, since 2003.

  1. Keith Douglas's avatar

    Cyber security professional here -reliably determining when a computational artifact (file, etc.) was created is *hard*. This is sorta why…

  2. sahpa's avatar

    Agreed with the other commentator. It is extremely unlikely that Pangram’s success is due to its cheating by reading metadata.

  3. Deirdre Anne's avatar
  4. Mark's avatar
  5. Mark Robert Taylor's avatar

    At the risk of self-advertising:… You claim “AI is unusual in degree, not in kind” and “It is not clear…

  6. F.E. Guerra-Pujol's avatar

    Apropos of Sagar’s wish to foist the A.I. industry by its own petard, this article appeared in print in yesterday’s…

  7. Claudio's avatar

    I teach both large courses, like Jurisprudence and Critical Legal Thinking (a.k.a Legal Argumentation), and small seminar-based courses at Edinburgh…

Some PGR mistakes–including omission of Michigan from Phil of Science (also LSE, Notre Dame)

Thanks to alert readers for already catching some typos and transcription errors.  (You may e-mail errors to me or Brit.)  The most serious one is that the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor was wrongly omitted from the General Philosophy of Science ranking, due to a transcription error–Michigan in fact had a rounded mean of 4.0 and a median and mode of 4.0 in this specialty, as one might have expected.   (Thanks to Brad Wray for flagging the surprising omission for us.)

ADDENDUM:  And LSE has a rounded mean of 4.0 and University of Notre Dame had a rounded mean of 3.5 in Philosophy of Science as well.  Apologies.  Brit is double-checking the scores in this category, which hopefully is the only one with transcription errors of this magnitude.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Designed with WordPress