News and views about philosophy, the academic profession, academic freedom, intellectual culture, and other topics. The world’s most popular philosophy blog, since 2003.
To be worth using, a detector needs not only (A) not get very many false positives, but also (B) get…
Everything you say is true, but what is the alternative? I don’t think people are advocating a return to in-class…
The discussion here assumes an institutional context where returning to supervised in-person assessment is at least theoretically feasible, a reasonable…
Cyber security professional here -reliably determining when a computational artifact (file, etc.) was created is *hard*. This is sorta why…
Agreed with the other commentator. It is extremely unlikely that Pangram’s success is due to its cheating by reading metadata.
I see this question as a bit naïve. There is metadata on every document created by a modern word processor…
There’s a simple way to test. Open a pre-2022 essay and copy-and-paste it into a new file.
This proto-punk band out of Michigan in the late 1960s has always had a bit of a cult following ("kick out the jams, motherfuckers!"), though this later number is less-known (though apt for the Independence Day weekend in America, where the ruse even has a Presidential candidate the MC5 couldn't have conjured):
And for those wanting a more typical MC5 number, here's a live 1970 performance of "Ramblin' Rose":
Leave a Reply