Leiter Reports: A Philosophy Blog

News and views about philosophy, the academic profession, academic freedom, intellectual culture, and other topics. The world’s most popular philosophy blog, since 2003.

  1. Justin Fisher's avatar

    To be worth using, a detector needs not only (A) not get very many false positives, but also (B) get…

  2. Mark's avatar

    Everything you say is true, but what is the alternative? I don’t think people are advocating a return to in-class…

  3. Deirdre Anne's avatar
  4. Keith Douglas's avatar

    Cyber security professional here -reliably determining when a computational artifact (file, etc.) was created is *hard*. This is sorta why…

  5. sahpa's avatar

    Agreed with the other commentator. It is extremely unlikely that Pangram’s success is due to its cheating by reading metadata.

  6. Deirdre Anne's avatar
  7. Mark's avatar

Philosophers who signed the “Open Letter” about Tuvel’s article on transracialism: why?

There's a nice takedown of the letter here, though as I noted in an earlier posting, most signatories (happily) are not academic philosophers.  But some are, including the very first signatory (Elise Springer [Wesleyan], who may or may not be the author, I do not know).   (Here's a copy of the letter with the signatories, the original letter site is down.)

Here are the philosophers whose names I recognized who signed this letter along with their institutional affiliation (I'm sure I missed some):  Elise Springer (Wesleyan), Lori Gruen (Wesleyan), Alice MacLachlan (York, Toronto), Tempest Henning (Vanderbilt), Luvell Anderson (Memphis), Gaile Polhaus (Miami University, Ohio), Samanthan Brennan (Western Ontario), Adriel Trott (Wabash), Leigh Johnson (Christian Brothers), Cynthia Willett (Emory), Lisa Guenther (Vanderbilt), Sharyn Clough (Oregon State), Ed Kazarian (Rowan), Cassie Herbert (Georgetown), Nora Berenstain (Tennessee), Rachel McKinnon (Charleston), Naomi Scheman (Minnesota), Rocio Zambrana (Oregon), Perry Zurn (American/Penn), Robin James (UNC-Charlotte), Karen Frost-Arnold (Hobart & William Smith), Julinna Oxley (Coastal Carolina), Daniel Smith (Penn State), Lisa Miracchi (Penn), Mark Lance (Georgetown), Ammon Allred (Toledo), Janice Dowell (Syracuse), Axel Mueller (Northwestern), Jill Gordon (Colby), Lynne Tirrell (U Mass, Boston), Alisa Carse (Georgetown), R.A. Briggs (Stanford),Lori Watson (San Diego), Annaleigh Curtis (PhD, Colorado; currently an attorney), Gabriel Rockhill (Villanova).

As a couple of readers pointed out to me, two signatories–Gruen and Guenther–were actually members of Prof. Tuvel's dissertation committee.  What a thing to do to a former student!

Now some of these signatories are among the "usual suspects" involved in cyber-nonsense (see, e.g., here, or here), but many are substantial and accomplished professional philosophers, junior and senior.  So I ask them:  can you please explain why you signed this letter?  You may also indicate if you now regret having signed, in light of the many criticisms that have been made.   Only signatories to the letter may post here (including signatories not mentioned above, whom I missed).  I will not permit responses to the explanations offered, this comment thread is strictly for those who signed the letter.  Given how outrageous this entire episode seems to so many, I think, in the Millian spirit, we need to hear from those involved as to how they are thinking about this episode.

Leave a Reply to Anon- Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

2 responses to “Philosophers who signed the “Open Letter” about Tuvel’s article on transracialism: why?”

  1. More: https://www.facebook.com/lisa.guenther.982/posts/1038387982962653

    Also, you left out Judith Butler.

    —–
    KEYWORDS:
    Primary Blog

Designed with WordPress