There's a good discussion here. It's a poorly reasoned decision, which I can't imagine surviving on appeal. Earlier discussion of the McAdams case here, here, here, and here.
I’d assumed Brian Garrett’s comment was meant as parody.
Leiter Reports: A Philosophy Blog
News and views about philosophy, the academic profession, academic freedom, intellectual culture, and other topics. The world’s most popular philosophy blog, since 2003.
Replying to Steve Innsbruck (just on the issue of Pangram reliability): “Some of the discussions I’ve seen about it in…
Hi Paul, Calling something a “Socratic questionnaire” already has a hint of irony about it; it’s a term that comes…
“What is less clear is how good Pangram is in distinguishing human-written text that has been polished by AI, from…
Thanks for the reports David! I’m glad to hear that this round was more responsive; I can tweak it a…
By “Socratic” I would expect that to mean, the machine would be following my train of thought, ala the midwife…
I tried the trolley problem once again, this time offering the argument that as I was not responsible for the…
Leave a Reply