Pretty shocking. Are there examples of philosophers regularly publishing in such journals?
(Thanks to Tom Carson for the pointer.)
News and views about philosophy, the academic profession, academic freedom, intellectual culture, and other topics. The world’s most popular philosophy blog, since 2003.
People should understand what precipitated my remarks here at Leiter Reports. Also, a few replies and comments on the conversation:…
As far as I am concerned, I am open to being convinced that AI is good for the profession. However,…
Kaufman seems to imply that proponents of the “important truths” view must maintain that the truths AI might help us…
Wallace’s distinction between the value of the philosophical process and the value of its product suggests a further complication, one…
It seems to me—no philosopher that I am—that, having reread Prof. Kaufman’s essay above, one might reasonably ask what, if…
I’m not sure whether an interactive, online logic textbook counts as an open-access philosophy book, but for those who might…
For a slightly more positive assessment, JS Mill: “The real advantage which truth has, consists in this, that when an…
Pretty shocking. Are there examples of philosophers regularly publishing in such journals?
(Thanks to Tom Carson for the pointer.)
All the philosophers who "publish" in the "journal" PHILOSOPHY STUDY are doing it. Some may not realize it, but they are. Also, it doesn't help that both the Philosopher's Index and https://philpapers.org index the "publications" in it. The papers in PHILOSOPHY STUDY should not be legitimized in this way.
Don't forget this story from (June 2013) on David Publishing. http://leiterreports.typepad.com/blog/2013/06/on-david-publishing-once-again.html
I was on a hiring committee last year and I noticed that a few candidates had published in predatory journals. I suspect that means that, likely, more than a few had: I suspect that plenty of the people whose applications I only gave a cursory read (either because they didn't fit our AOS or because they were very clearly unqualified in some other way) had, as well. But I still suspect the number was fairly small.
—–
KEYWORDS:
Primary Blog
Leave a Reply