News and views about philosophy, the academic profession, academic freedom, intellectual culture, and other topics. The world’s most popular philosophy blog, since 2003.
Everything you say is true, but what is the alternative? I don’t think people are advocating a return to in-class…
The discussion here assumes an institutional context where returning to supervised in-person assessment is at least theoretically feasible, a reasonable…
Cyber security professional here -reliably determining when a computational artifact (file, etc.) was created is *hard*. This is sorta why…
Agreed with the other commentator. It is extremely unlikely that Pangram’s success is due to its cheating by reading metadata.
I see this question as a bit naïve. There is metadata on every document created by a modern word processor…
There’s a simple way to test. Open a pre-2022 essay and copy-and-paste it into a new file.
At the risk of self-advertising:… You claim “AI is unusual in degree, not in kind” and “It is not clear…
MOVING TO FRONT FROM NOVEMBER 17–UPDATED
The teacher was clearly well within her pedagogical rights, while the university's response was disgraceful. (That Jordan Peterson is, in some ways, a nut is irrelevant to the use of Peterson's work made by the teacher here, which was wholly appropriate.)
UPDATE: You can listen to an audio of the conversation between the TA and administrators. The administrators don't come off too well, to put it mildly.
Leave a Reply