Leiter Reports: A Philosophy Blog

News and views about philosophy, the academic profession, academic freedom, intellectual culture, and other topics. The world’s most popular philosophy blog, since 2003.

  1. A in the UK's avatar
  2. Jonathan Turner's avatar

    I agree with all of this. The threat is really that stark. The only solution is indeed in-class essay exams,…

  3. Craig Duncan's avatar
  4. Ludovic's avatar

    My big problem with LLMs at the present time, apart from being potentially the epitome of Foucault’s panopticon & Big…

  5. A in the UK's avatar

    I’m also at a British university (in a law school) and my sentiments largely align with the author’s. I see…

  6. André Hampshire's avatar

    If one is genuinely uninterested in engaging with non-human interlocutors, it is unclear why one continues to do so—especially while…

  7. Steven Hales's avatar

Threats to academic freedom in Australia from Chinese pressure

This is a striking set of stories that bode ill for core academic freedom in Australian universities.   Too many Australian universities are already struggling with mindless bureaucrats micro-managing university life; add to that the need for Chinese tuition dollars, and it's a dangerous mix of incentives.   Curious to hear from others "on the ground" there about what's going on, so comments are open.

Leave a Reply to Dirk Baltzly Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

One response to “Threats to academic freedom in Australia from Chinese pressure”

  1. There's a further wrinkle to this story. An Australian academic (and member of a prominent left think-tank) claims that Allen & Unwin have delayed publication of his book out of fear of Chinese govt retaliation. Prof. Clive Hamilton was unwilling to wait and the rights to the book have been returned to him. A&U were cautious claiming that they are 'awaiting clarification concerning matters before the courts' at the moment. Hamilton claims that legal has been all over the manuscript to remove anything defamatory, so there can be no rational basis for fearing legal action. Who knows where the truth lies. But if indeed a publisher has caved to pressure, this seems far more worrying than the episodes discussed in the NY Times article.

    Story on the ABC website here http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-11-13/academic-claims-hes-been-silenced-by-chinese-government/9142694

    —–
    KEYWORDS:
    Primary Blog

Designed with WordPress