Matthew Petersen withdraws from further consideration for a federal district judgeship in wake of questioning by Senator Kennedy (R-LA) showing that he didn't know what the Daubert standard was and didn't know what a motion in limine is, among other rather remarkable gaps in his knowledge for someone aspiring to be a trial judge! (Here's the full questioning by Senator Kennedy, who is an experienced lawyer and also, like Mr. Petersen, a graduate of the University of Virginia Law School.)
Leiter Reports: A Philosophy Blog
News and views about philosophy, the academic profession, academic freedom, intellectual culture, and other topics. The world’s most popular philosophy blog, since 2003.
Hi Dan, Actually, no, that the engine is next-token prediction does not entail that “there is only so much recycling,…
I’m a mathematician who works on AI research, though not specifically on training LLMs. Basically, we really don’t know what’s…
My experience with LLMs as a layperson/non-philosopher is that the aforesaid are excellent as spell checkers and translators (and, at…
I think we need to separate several different issues here: the future of the university, the future of education, the…
True enough, but at least with words, AI is training on whatever words are available. I’d still like some explanation…
Unless we accept dualism, ultimately any creative process comes down to high-level emergent consequences of a very complex system whose…
I just want to address this comment: > What initially presents itself as impressive intelligence can, upon closer inspection by…