The tide is clearly turning on the procedural irregularities of Title IX proceedings at universities when the New York Times runs a story plainly sympathetic to the accused rather than the accuser.
(Thanks to Gregory Mayer for the pointer.)
News and views about philosophy, the academic profession, academic freedom, intellectual culture, and other topics. The world’s most popular philosophy blog, since 2003.
Cyber security professional here -reliably determining when a computational artifact (file, etc.) was created is *hard*. This is sorta why…
Agreed with the other commentator. It is extremely unlikely that Pangram’s success is due to its cheating by reading metadata.
I see this question as a bit naïve. There is metadata on every document created by a modern word processor…
There’s a simple way to test. Open a pre-2022 essay and copy-and-paste it into a new file.
At the risk of self-advertising:… You claim “AI is unusual in degree, not in kind” and “It is not clear…
Apropos of Sagar’s wish to foist the A.I. industry by its own petard, this article appeared in print in yesterday’s…
I teach both large courses, like Jurisprudence and Critical Legal Thinking (a.k.a Legal Argumentation), and small seminar-based courses at Edinburgh…
The tide is clearly turning on the procedural irregularities of Title IX proceedings at universities when the New York Times runs a story plainly sympathetic to the accused rather than the accuser.
(Thanks to Gregory Mayer for the pointer.)
Leave a Reply