News and views about philosophy, the academic profession, academic freedom, intellectual culture, and other topics. The world’s most popular philosophy blog, since 2003.
[…] Brian Leiter brought this website on legal research through AI by Professor Dan Epps. Here is the website. […]
I suspect the concerns Dreyfus raised, many of them, do still apply, even though, as Michael Clune says, Dreyfus’ discussions…
I was simply wondering about this: 1) Dreyfus argues that much human thought/action arises from nonformalizable processes. 2) In the…
I don’t see any connection between the knowing how/that issue and LLM opacity. Can you elaborate?
Clune’s distinction seems to me exactly right, with one qualification. Dreyfus’s original target was largely what later came to be…
It is still relevant. But perhaps someone will offer an argument why it is not.
My sense is that the Dreyfus critique was aimed primarily at what was called “good old fashioned ai,” an ultimately…
I'll just link to the piece I wrote when Judge Gorsuch was nominated. I guarantee there won't be an honest discussion this time either. I don't think Kavanaugh will vote to overturn Roe, for what it's worth. I do think his ascendancy to the Supreme Court will guarantee the irrelevancy of that institution for the next generation.
Leave a Reply