Leiter Reports: A Philosophy Blog

News and views about philosophy, the academic profession, academic freedom, intellectual culture, and other topics. The world’s most popular philosophy blog, since 2003.

  1. Fool's avatar
  2. Santa Monica's avatar
  3. Charles Bakker's avatar
  4. Matty Silverstein's avatar
  5. Jason's avatar
  6. Nathan Meyvis's avatar
  7. Stefan Sciaraffa's avatar

    The McMaster Department of Philosophy has now put together the following notice commemorating Barry: Barry Allen: A Philosophical Life Barry…

‘Foundation for Excellence in Higher Education’: what’s the story?

A philosopher elsewhere writes:

I would be grateful to read any comments from your readers on the impact that programs sponsored by "The Foundation for Excellence in Higher Education"(https://excellenceinhighered.org) have had on campuses — and especially on Philosophy Departments. Campus institutes sponsored by this Foundation are described as concerned with "education for a good life," "classical intellectual traditions", "human flourishing", "enduring principles of reason that underlie intellectual inquiry", and so forth. The Foundation sponsors institutes closely connected to Berkeley, Stanford, Oxford, Harvard, Chicago, Penn, Texas at Austin, Yale, and elsewhere. Any information about how these programs have affected faculty appointments, undergraduate curricula, and campus climate would be especially welcome.'

Judging from the faculty affiliates at several of these universities, it seems clear this Foundation has a right-wing and religious tilt.  But beyond that superficial observation, I know nothing about it.  Readers?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

4 responses to “‘Foundation for Excellence in Higher Education’: what’s the story?”

  1. I'm involved with the one at Berkeley (the Berkeley Institute), and I have been since it began. I run occasional short seminars under the heading 'Religion and Rationality', and my seminars are primarily a place for students with religious commitments to have academic discussions with these commitments in view, or for students of no particular religious orientation to have academic discussions that bear on the truth of various religious hypotheses. I started doing these seminars because I had a large number of students, of various religious traditions, come to my office hours to discuss the question of how their religious commitments should relate to their academic commitments and vice versa; and so it seemed to me that our students had an unmet need. The Berkeley Institute is neither religiously nor politically affiliated in any official capacity. Demographically, a large number of our students are committed Christians (though this certainly isn't the only demographic involved), but both the faculty and the students are all over the map politically. We are completely independent of the university have nothing to do with faculty appointments or curricula, except (trivially) in each of the faculty members' capacity as faculty member. I can't speak to campus climate–we're not a very big operation (each of my seminars has had about 10-20 students), so I doubt we would have any sort of visible impact on much of anything, but I've personally witnessed a nice atmosphere of friendly and open-minded discussion in the seminars, including discussion of topics about which people disagree strongly. I have no idea about programs at other institutions. I hope this helps.

  2. Samuel J. Howard

    You can see the Foundation's most recent form 990 here (PDF), which lists its trustees, major donors, and major donations for the past year.

  3. Samuel J. Howard

    Hmm…. looks like my html was stripped…

    The 990 is here: http://990s.foundationcenter.org/990pf_pdf_archive/461/461439784/461439784_201712_990PF.pdf

    —–
    KEYWORDS:
    Primary Blog

Designed with WordPress