News and views about philosophy, the academic profession, academic freedom, intellectual culture, and other topics. The world’s most popular philosophy blog, since 2003.
To be worth using, a detector needs not only (A) not get very many false positives, but also (B) get…
Everything you say is true, but what is the alternative? I don’t think people are advocating a return to in-class…
The discussion here assumes an institutional context where returning to supervised in-person assessment is at least theoretically feasible, a reasonable…
Cyber security professional here -reliably determining when a computational artifact (file, etc.) was created is *hard*. This is sorta why…
Agreed with the other commentator. It is extremely unlikely that Pangram’s success is due to its cheating by reading metadata.
I see this question as a bit naïve. There is metadata on every document created by a modern word processor…
There’s a simple way to test. Open a pre-2022 essay and copy-and-paste it into a new file.
MOVING TO AGAIN–IF YOU WORK IN MORAL AND/OR POLITICAL, PLEASE VOTE
A new poll, just with specialty journals, including several that were wrongly omitted from the last, more general poll. One reader who asked for a poll just with the specialty journals wanted something that promotion and tenure committees could point to. If you work in moral and political philosophy, please vote! And remember, the more journals you rank, the more impact your individual vote has.
Leave a Reply