News and views about philosophy, the academic profession, academic freedom, intellectual culture, and other topics. The world’s most popular philosophy blog, since 2003.
This is a load of cobblers. Philosophers need to read more Searle & watch less 2001. Computers, however fancy, are…
I wonder how feasible and time-intensive it would be to make it a standard policy check for undisclosed AI usage.…
One provocative read (if you can get past the sensationalistic headline) is econ blogger Noah Smith’s substack post from last…
Yes. This topic is hard to talk about because it ticks all the boxes for what one might rave about…
Not sure it is obvious that it is the dog wagging the tail. It might well be that the tail…
What I find interesting is how much of a gap there is in competence across different domains. Brian’s remark about…
Yes, I think this is the real issue and it also points to where and when everything really has gone…
Round 1 (from S.A. Lloyd [USC]and A.P. Martinich [Texas]); round 2 (responses to Lloyd and Martinich, including from Noel Malcolm, editor of the new OUP edition); and now round 3: a response from Professor Lloyd, which she asked me to share: Download Lloyd reply re Hobbes edition. I'm an outsider to Hobbes studies, but I am inclined to agree with Professor Lloyd.
Leave a Reply