Leiter Reports: A Philosophy Blog

News and views about philosophy, the academic profession, academic freedom, intellectual culture, and other topics. The world’s most popular philosophy blog, since 2003.

  1. Nate Meyvis's avatar
  2. Peter Buckmaster's avatar
  3. Jörg Schaub's avatar
  4. David Wallace's avatar
  5. David Wallace's avatar
  6. Catherine Sutton's avatar
  7. Mark's avatar

President of Brown’s proposal for how colleges can open in the fall

Sensible enough, and echoes some ideas seen in the Purdue plan and in thoughts I posted about this awhile ago.  An excerpt:

All campuses must be able to conduct rapid testing for the coronavirus for all students, when they first arrive on campus and at regular intervals throughout the year. Testing only those with symptoms will not be sufficient. We now know that many people who have the disease are asymptomatic. Regular testing is the only way to prevent the disease from spreading silently through dormitories and classrooms.

Traditional contact tracing is not sufficient on a college campus, where students may not know who they sat next to in a lecture or attended a party with. Digital technology can help. Several states are working to adapt mobile apps created by private companies to trace the spread of disease, and colleges and universities can play a role by collaborating with their state health departments and rolling out tracing technology on their campuses.

Testing and tracing will be useful only if students who are ill or who have been exposed to the virus can be separated from others. Traditional dormitories with shared bedrooms and bathrooms are not adequate. Setting aside appropriate spaces for isolation and quarantine (e.g. hotel rooms) may be costly, but necessary. It will also be necessary to ensure that students abide by the rigorous requirements of isolation and quarantine.

It's an open question, of course, whether enough testing will be available come late summer–I would imagine every university hoping to open is in the process of trying to secure tests, as well as masks, hand sanitizer, and the like.   Schools in college towns won't have adequate hotel space to draw on, so they may need to create dorms for those who are sick (to that end, schools ought to be granting some number of deferrals to create space on campus).   Unmentioned, but essential it seems to me, are mandatory flu shots, so that colleges aren't dealing with two infectious outbreaks at once.  All of this will also be costly, and some schools won't be able to bear the cost, so will revert to on-line instruction.  

Feel free to link to other plans colleges are making (and see some of those noted here and in the comments).

(Thanks to Jonathan Kramnick for the pointer.)

ADDENDUM:  One thing the Brown President also does not mention, but which seems to me crucial, is to start earlier in August so as to conclude the fall term before Thanksgiving.  I can't imagine anything more counter-productive then shipping thousands of students to homes around the country for af ew days, then bringing them back to campus for a couple of more weeks!  It will be hard enough to do all the testing etc. for the start of the Winter/Spring term, colleges really should plan on ending by Thanksgiving, even if that means losing a week of instruction.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

12 responses to “President of Brown’s proposal for how colleges can open in the fall”

  1. I know it won't resonate with someone where the football stadium was last used meaningfully for the creation of the first artificial nuclear chain reaction, which occurred within the Amos Alonzo Stagg Field's stands, or with the person who runs Brown, but I have been saying since the beginning of the current shutdown that if the President doesn’t have the country open for college football season, which kicks off on August 29, 2020, he will not be re-elected.

    The previous President had it wrong when he said, while a candidate, about Republican voters, “They cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people.” He left out the thing they cling to most, “How will State U fare in football this season.”

  2. testing obviously key but so is spacing:
    "the attack rate was as high as 43.5%. This outbreak shows alarmingly that severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) can be exceptionally contagious in crowded office settings such as a call center. The magnitude of the outbreak illustrates how a high-density work environment can become a high-risk site for the spread of COVID-19 and potentially a source of further transmission.
    https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/26/8/20-1274_article

  3. B. Leiter originally wrote,
    ‘…start earlier in August so as to conclude the fall term before Thanksgiving. I can't imagine anything more counter-productive then shipping thousands of students to homes around the country for af ew days, then bringing them back to campus for a couple of more weeks!’

    I swear this is a good idea, plague or no plague. My former university had maybe 10 days after Thanksgiving until finals, and I’m pretty sure CU Boulder was about to he same. Those days are an utter waste. Students lost their steam over break and just don't have time to work back into things.

  4. I do not recall seeing in the Purdue plan, and did not see in this one, any mention of how to protect older faculty. For someone in his/her 60s, a closed room full of college students is a hazardous work environment.

  5. No one ever says how the professors are supposed to deal with this.

  6. I take it testing of students and quarantining the ill plus students wearing face masks is supposed to protect faculty. And social distancing, eg, students sit away from the professor.

  7. My husband is a 62 year old physics professor who had a quadruple bypass a few years ago. He's also hypertensive. We're not too keen on his chances in a physics lab. I can imagine many other faculty are thinking this as articles start popping up about opening campus for the fall.

  8. As the Purdue President noted, some faculty may have to continue teaching remotely for their safety, and any sensible policy would have to make such accomodations for someone like your husband.

  9. Re older faculty, and to Brian Leiter: the halls between classes are going to be very difficult- really, impossible- for "social distancing." For schools with large populations of commuter students, testing is going to be of limited protective value: commuters should really be tested each day they show up for class. (And that's assuming that the tests give immediate results and are accurate: I've read that the swab test gets it right only 70% of the time. I'd be glad to be corrected on that.) Further, masks and distancing might work in a large lecture hall, but are (I suspect) going to be of limited worth given an hour's confinement in a small space with students. Even the best masks do not confine 100% of any virus one breathes out, and I've read that the virus can actually be transmitted within a radius of 20+ feet, so that current guidance on distancing is inadequate. If all this is correct, then really, for older faculty, remote teaching seems like the only safe option till they can be vaccinated.

  10. I agree that for commuter campuses, the Brown or Purdue ideas won't work at all. These ideas are only viable at residential campuses. I've seen no credible report that anyone has been infected by the virus at a distance of 20 feet; the overwhelming majority of cases are due to "close contact."

  11. Many thanks for the correction.

  12. I take it that Paxson's letter was designed more to show how difficult reopening on campus will be than an commitment to it.

    —–
    KEYWORDS:
    Primary Blog

Designed with WordPress