Leiter Reports: A Philosophy Blog

News and views about philosophy, the academic profession, academic freedom, intellectual culture, and other topics. The world’s most popular philosophy blog, since 2003.

  1. V. Alan White's avatar
  2. Colin Marshall's avatar

    Thanks so much for this, Matthew. I hadn’t heard about UKALPP’s approach, but it sounds like an excellent model for…

  3. Matthew H. Kramer's avatar

    Thanks to Colin Marshall for an excellent document. The annual UK Analytic Legal & Political Philosophy (UKALPP) Conference now convenes…

  4. Colin Marshall's avatar

    Thanks for this comment, Alan. I think the point you make carries weight – especially for some younger philosophers, in-person…

  5. V. Alan White's avatar

    I’m a lifelong APA member with APA emeritus status. I see many reasons for the online conference, and perhaps the…

  6. Colin Marshall's avatar

    Thanks for this, Matt – a good point. In scheduling the Pacific APA, Alex Sager and I did what I…

  7. Matt Lister's avatar

    “But, on the other hand, a virtual APA is in principle available to philosophers around the world” This is often…

U.S. Justice Department finds Yale discriminates in admissions against whites and Asian-Americans

This is pretty dramatic, and will no doubt lead to similar findings of violations by other schools, since all elite universities in the U.S. do exactly what Yale is doing (which is really discriminating in favor of African-Americans in a zero-sum game, i.e., admissions).  The resulting litigation will eventually makes its way to the Supreme Court, where the "plain meaning" textualism that yielded a happy outcome with respect to sex discrimination against transgender people will yield an unhappy outcome here:   affirmative action will be found to violate the civil rights law.   As I've remarked before, I do expect all affirmative action programs in universities to be found unlawful (in the case of private universities) and unconstitutional (in the case of public universities) by this conservative Supreme Court.  (By contrast, I am pretty confident this Court will not overrule Roe v. Wade, but will continue to approve practices that burden but do not wholly abrogate the right to choose abortion, which has been the Court's approach for the last thirty years basically.)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Designed with WordPress