Leiter Reports: A Philosophy Blog

News and views about philosophy, the academic profession, academic freedom, intellectual culture, and other topics. The world’s most popular philosophy blog, since 2003.

  1. V. Alan White's avatar
  2. Colin Marshall's avatar

    Thanks so much for this, Matthew. I hadn’t heard about UKALPP’s approach, but it sounds like an excellent model for…

  3. Matthew H. Kramer's avatar

    Thanks to Colin Marshall for an excellent document. The annual UK Analytic Legal & Political Philosophy (UKALPP) Conference now convenes…

  4. Colin Marshall's avatar

    Thanks for this comment, Alan. I think the point you make carries weight – especially for some younger philosophers, in-person…

  5. V. Alan White's avatar

    I’m a lifelong APA member with APA emeritus status. I see many reasons for the online conference, and perhaps the…

  6. Colin Marshall's avatar

    Thanks for this, Matt – a good point. In scheduling the Pacific APA, Alex Sager and I did what I…

  7. Matt Lister's avatar

    “But, on the other hand, a virtual APA is in principle available to philosophers around the world” This is often…

Philosopher Kathleen Stock (Sussex) recognized in Queen’s “Honours” for 2020…

…with an OBE for "services to higher education," no doubt in recognition of her advocacy for free intellectual discussion of the idea of "gender identity" and the ramifications of replacing biological sex with "gender identity" for various legal protections afforded women.   Professor Stock uses the occasion to note some of the threats to the former here.

For a typically gracious reaction to this news, here is philosopher Liam Bright (LSE):

Liam Bright on Stock

Professor Bright's insult was retweeted by Dominic Berry (LSE), Chris Bertram (Bristol), Rebecca Buxton (Oxford), and others well-known for their contempt for academic freedom.   The attempt by philosopher Peter Cave, in the response to Bright and Bertram, to elicit rational discussion went nowhere, unsurprisingly.  It is curious that, although Professor Stock's arguments and advocacy on these issues has been well-known since May 2018, there has been exactly one substantive response by philosophers (as distinct from sneering dismissiveness, like Liam Bright's, above), itself not successful (see Sophie Allen's comment at the preceding link) but at least (mostly) serious in its engagement.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Designed with WordPress