News and views about philosophy, the academic profession, academic freedom, intellectual culture, and other topics. The world’s most popular philosophy blog, since 2003.
To be worth using, a detector needs not only (A) not get very many false positives, but also (B) get…
Everything you say is true, but what is the alternative? I don’t think people are advocating a return to in-class…
The discussion here assumes an institutional context where returning to supervised in-person assessment is at least theoretically feasible, a reasonable…
Cyber security professional here -reliably determining when a computational artifact (file, etc.) was created is *hard*. This is sorta why…
Agreed with the other commentator. It is extremely unlikely that Pangram’s success is due to its cheating by reading metadata.
I see this question as a bit naïve. There is metadata on every document created by a modern word processor…
There’s a simple way to test. Open a pre-2022 essay and copy-and-paste it into a new file.
This is right as far as it goes. He of course had an authoritarian mindset and contempt for democracy and democratic norms. The analogy made to the fascism of the 1930s may be highly imperfect (it is), but the fact that there are any points of similarity is bad enough, and there is plenty of potential for world-historic wickedness and disaster without being just like Hitler.
(Thanks to David Lobina for the pointer.)
Leave a Reply