Leiter Reports: A Philosophy Blog

News and views about philosophy, the academic profession, academic freedom, intellectual culture, and other topics. The world’s most popular philosophy blog, since 2003.

  1. David Wallace's avatar
  2. Mark's avatar
  3. Valerie Dawson's avatar

    Exactly! The question is not whether AI is conscious or forms human-like intentions. The question is whether AI–in carrying out…

  4. Valerie Dawson's avatar
  5. David Wallace's avatar

    This is a very strange comment. Searle’s Chinese Room, and his general position on intentionality, were controversial, and criticized (correctly,…

  6. Nat Hansen's avatar
  7. Phil Bold's avatar

Finacial issues in the Pennsylvania State System of Higher Education

I asked philosopher Steven Hales (Bloomsburg) if he could share some of what he and colleagues in the Pa. State System are confronting.  His account is bracing, and no doubt not unfamiliar elsewhere:

Pennsylvania has a very strange public higher ed system. On the one hand are the state-related universities like Penn State, University of Pittsburgh, and Temple. They get about 5% of their funding from the state. Then there are the 14 state-owned universities that comprise the PA State System of Higher Education (PASSHE). My university, Bloomsburg, is one of these. We get about 25% of our budget from the state. According to the system chancellor, out of 50 states, PA is 47th when it comes to funding public higher ed. The PASSHE schools are struggling due to a perfect storm of factors: years of underfunding, massive cuts after the 2009 fiscal crisis, declining numbers of high school graduates, and COVID. As a result, the majority of the 14 universities are insolvent, with cratering enrollments and debt they cannot escape.

The Chancellor has instructed that three universities in the western part of the State—California, Edinboro, and Clarion—merge. Also three in the mideastern part of the state are to combine. Bloomsburg is to merge with Lock Haven (70 miles away) and Mansfield (90 miles away). Bloomsburg is far and away the strongest and most solvent of the three, but this is like telling a struggling swimmer to save two drowning swimmers. We are advised that they are going to fire 2/3rds of the administrators, retrench some of the faculty, make us teach hybrid classes, and somehow everything is going to be OK. So my Dean or Provost could wind up being 90 miles away, and I never meet them except on Zoom. Oh, and all academic departments will be scattered objects. I will be the Chair of a philosophy department (assuming we survive) with members at three different constituent colleges.

The Chancellor has said that if this does not work, next year he will propose dissolving the state system altogether. Now, all of the PASSHE schools have proud histories going back to the 19th century. We only became a unified system in 1982. If we dissolve the system and all the universities remain public but independent, it will stop the financial drain from the stronger to the weaker schools. The result will be a Darwinian one: the strong survive and the weak perish. I have no idea whether this is ultimately for the best or not, but I certainly feel for all those perfectly decent scholars and staff who will lose their jobs.

Of course there was no systematic study done of possible alternative plans to these mergers, and no real economic analysis. We will marry in haste and repent at leisure. And it is a shotgun wedding: everyone is somewhere on the scale of worried to panicked. The state legislature is packed with businesspeople who think the sole purpose of a university is to feed young citizens into the maw of capitalism, so I am in the position of once again having to defend the existence of philosophy. It is grindingly depressing.

Readers aware of similar issues elsewhere should add details or links in the comments.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

2 responses to “Finacial issues in the Pennsylvania State System of Higher Education”

  1. Thanks for sharing that, Steve, really well-written and informative. Wishing y'all the best!

    In Michigan, it's sort of the inverse of PA: our state schools aren't unified, even the "directional" ones that people tend to assume are (Western, Eastern, Central, and Northern). Michigan (flagship) and Michigan State (land grant) are also independent, though UM has other campuses (e.g., Flint, Deerborn). I would have expected pressure to combine any of these, but that doesn't seem to be happening; at WMU we had about an $80M projected shortfall, UM was closer to $1B, and everyone's just sort of working through it on their own. But because they're independent and don't have shared destinies, there's going to be a lot of competition for fewer high-school graduates and I figure a lot of these institutions will downsize. I don't think they'll be eliminated because they have fairly different geographic bases.

  2. I am not at all surprised by what's happening in Pennsylvania given my experience in the University of Wisconsin System. But in the case of my university experience, much of the damage has been done politically and could have been avoided otherwise. When I retired a few years ago, the System had 26 campuses, 13 as R1s or comprehensive 4-years, and 13 2-years (like mine at Manitowoc) that acted primarily as transfers to the 4-years, giving accessibility to BAs to many students in small city and rural areas. I was a member of a strong statewide philosophy department of the 2-years (averaging 12-16 tenured faculty) which collectively typically out-published many of the 4-years and featured several state and national teaching award-winning instructors (yeah me too). But then the political climate changed about a decade ago, leading to tuition freezes that still exist to this day, manufactured "crises" about spending reserve funds that finally required those reserves to be spent down while reducing state support, resulting in having no safety net for the campuses when demographic enrollment decline hit along with the pandemic. After I retired all the 2-years were absorbed by the 13 4-years subject to their individual budgeting and planning. My department (and all such 2-year departments) dissolved. I along with many others took early retirement with a buy-out (facing being put on the road and online to teach as the only alternatives). Although my own campus, now an arm of the University of Wisconsin–Green Bay, has fared better than many of the other 13, the future is insecure and the present is very dire for the humanities. There are two–*two*–tenured humanities faculty on my campus, both in English (one is near 80). There are now no sociology, history, anthropology, or psychology classes (to name just a few lost) and just one on-line philosophy class (I taught a 4/4 for almost 40 years with some of the highest total enrollment until I retired). Our campus is now predominately STEM, though at least it survives as such (thanks mostly to incredible faculty that we have that any R1 would be lucky to employ). So in just a few years we went from a 26-campus system to a 13-campus system, with the 2-years struggling and several in imminent danger of closure. Sure, demographics and the pandemic are huge factors here, but I just want to say that in large part our truly excellent System was badly damaged deliberately by Republicans and the manic fear of what we provide(d)–liberal arts education in the tradition of the Wisconsin Idea–that the University's boundaries are those of the state's. I am proud to have served in that tradition–and I detest those who have worked to deliberately erode it.

    —–
    KEYWORDS:
    Primary Blog

Designed with WordPress