News and views about philosophy, the academic profession, academic freedom, intellectual culture, and other topics. The world’s most popular philosophy blog, since 2003.
Don’t click the transcript – it’s a mis-transcription that makes Harvey sound unhinged. The bit of it that’s visible without…
I don’t think it’s that the philosophical debates will become irrelevant in your example, so much that your example demonstrates…
I agree with what you’re saying, but I want to bring up a possible non-sequitor: I’m confused by why the…
Exactly! The question is not whether AI is conscious or forms human-like intentions. The question is whether AI–in carrying out…
Unfortunately, this piece seems quite out of date now that the Hugging Fact incident has been exposed. I’m not sure…
This is a very strange comment. Searle’s Chinese Room, and his general position on intentionality, were controversial, and criticized (correctly,…
Hey Paul, thanks for giving this a shot! If want to send me your transcript or the broad outlines of…
The winner is Graham Bex-Priestly (Leeds) for a paper on "Expressivists Should Be Reductive Naturalists," and the runner-up is Claire Kirwin (Clemson) for a paper on "Value Realism and Idiosyncrasy."
(As a point of personal privilege, let me say I'm especially pleased to see Professor Kirwin's work recognized, since I had the good fortune to work with her here at Chicago.)
Leave a Reply