Leiter Reports: A Philosophy Blog

News and views about philosophy, the academic profession, academic freedom, intellectual culture, and other topics. The world’s most popular philosophy blog, since 2003.

  1. Roger of Invisible America's avatar
  2. Brian Leiter's avatar
  3. Michael Clune's avatar
  4. Richard Moore's avatar
  5. Nicola Mößner's avatar
  6. François Kammerer's avatar
  7. Mark's avatar

In Memoriam: Terence Parsons (1939-2022)

ORIGINALLY POSTED JULY 30–UPDATED AGAIN

Well-known for his work in philosophy of language and metaphysics, Professor Parsons was emeritus at UCLA, where he spent the last twelve years of his career.  He taught before that at the University of Illinois at Chicago, the University of Massachusetts at Amherst, and the University of California at Irvine.  I will add links to memorial notices as they appear.

(Thanks to Dom Lopes for the information.)

UPDATE (8/2/22):  Ed Zalta (Stanford) kindly shared this remembrance:

I was extremely saddened to hear that Terry Parsons passed away. Though I hadn't been in regular contact with Terry for some time, he had a significant impact on my philosophical development.  I took three classes from him while I was a graduate student at U. Massachusetts/Amherst (1976-1980): one on Frege, a graduate seminar on Tense and Aspect (co-taught with Barbara Partee), and a graduate seminar in which we read through the manuscript of his then forthcoming book Nonexistent Objects.  His classes were always insightful and helped me to get a sense of what was really going on in the texts we were studying. But it was his seminar on nonexistent objects that changed my thinking in radical ways.  I learned how to do axiomatic metaphysics in that class and though I started to work on an alternative to his theory of nonexistents, Terry agreed to supervise my thesis when I approached him about a dissertation.

   Terry took at job a U. California/Irvine soon thereafter, and I'm thankful that he was willing to carry on as my thesis advisor.  I would send him a (revised) chapter once a month and we would then schedule a phone call so that he could offer comments.  Terry was always helpful and constructive, notwithstanding the fact that I was working on an alternative view. He would routinely point out issues that had to be tackled and solved, and suggest improvements and ways of proceeding that would help me better develop my ideas. I learned an incredible amount from those one-hour phone calls and am indebted to him for instructing me in philosophical methodologies and standards that have served me well over the years.

   Terry's work, including 4 books, offers a significant body of philosophical ideas; it is well worth the study. He was never satisfied with just a purely formal solution to a philosophical problem.  A brief look at a list of his most important publications (still available at https://philosophy.ucla.edu/person/terence-parsons/) shows the wide range of his views, with a focus primarily on logic, language, metaphysics and modality but also including a significant study of medieval logic. Though I only had a limited number of chances to talk (philosophy) with Terry, those occasions were memorable.  He had a great sense of humor and was always cheerful and friendly. I'll miss him.

I've opened comments for others who would like to share memories of Professor Parsons.

UPDATE (8/22/22):  The UCLA memorial notice is here.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

4 responses to “In Memoriam: Terence Parsons (1939-2022)”

  1. Terry, the outgoing president of the APA, Pacific Division, gave the introduction to my presidential address. It was extraordinarily kind and comprehensive in ways I hadn't imagined. One thing I especially appreciated was that Terry got in touch with many (if not all!) of my former and then-current graduate students, and he shared various of their "tributes" and stories. I still remember them, and treasure them to this day. It was obvious that Terry worked really hard on this and gave it a lot of thought–he didn't just "dial it in," like many of these introductions (well-meaning as they are).

    After such an introduction, I often begin with (the somewhat over-worked), "I wish my mother could have heard that." On this occasion I was able to say that it was not necessary to begin in that way, because my mother WAS there and DID hear it! It was such a kind, humble, and generous introduction, that even my mother didn't think anything more (nice!) could have been said.

    Terry showed by his own example that a penetrating intellect can coexist with a humane humility.

  2. Ed Alta's report of a seminar Terry taught using one of his unpublished books as a text rings a bell. When Was a graduate student (Pitt), Terry visited, and taught a seminar using a typescript of an unpublished book(*) as text. It was a great way to let us graduate students see (logico-linguistic) philosophy in process, and so get a sense of how it is done!
    On the personal side: I didn't have much contact with him after that year, but certainly liked him when visited Pitt.
    On the philosophical: he repeatedly found neglected ideas, and showed how they could be developed in formally rigorous and impressively comprehensive theories: the neo-Meinongianism of his Nonexistent Objects, which Ed refers to, is only one example. I've worked through his Articulating Medieval Logic once, with an informal seminar… and want to work through it again, more carefully! (One of Terry's earliest papers showed how quantified modal logic could be understood without invoking "essentialism," but remarked that a more interesting project would be to develop a theory of essences– this a year or two before Kripke's Naming and Necessity.)
    Never as well-known as some others, but a very insightful and constructive philosopher.
    —
    (*) That book, on the semantics of natural language, seems never to have come out: some of the ideas in it he probably abandoned, and others he incorporated in later work

  3. This is not my favorite thing by Terry, but I did read it (but did not use what I learned…)

    https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/413jwHa6f9L._SY264_BO1,204,203,200_QL40_ML2_.jpg

  4. He had a very droll sense of humor. I applied for an NEH grant to support writing my book Attitude Problems. I asked Terry for a letter, which he agreed to write. I got the grant and thanked him, receiving in reply just this: "They must have misunderstood my letter".

    —–
    KEYWORDS:
    Primary Blog

Designed with WordPress