Leiter Reports: A Philosophy Blog

News and views about philosophy, the academic profession, academic freedom, intellectual culture, and other topics. The world’s most popular philosophy blog, since 2003.

  1. Mark Robert Taylor's avatar

    At the risk of self-advertising:… You claim “AI is unusual in degree, not in kind” and “It is not clear…

  2. F.E. Guerra-Pujol's avatar

    Apropos of Sagar’s wish to foist the A.I. industry by its own petard, this article appeared in print in yesterday’s…

  3. Claudio's avatar

    I teach both large courses, like Jurisprudence and Critical Legal Thinking (a.k.a Legal Argumentation), and small seminar-based courses at Edinburgh…

  4. Charles Pigden's avatar

    Surely there is an answer to the problem of AI cheating which averts the existential threat. . It’s not great,…

  5. Mark's avatar

    I’d like to pose a question. Let’s be pessimistic for the moment, and assume AI *does* destroy the university, at…

  6. A in the UK's avatar
  7. Jonathan Turner's avatar

    I agree with all of this. The threat is really that stark. The only solution is indeed in-class essay exams,…

Blast from the past: Irresponsible philosophy faculty, how widespread a phenomenon?

Back in 2005, with reader discussion.  I'll open comments here in case any readers want to comment on changes in the interim.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

One response to “Blast from the past: Irresponsible philosophy faculty, how widespread a phenomenon?”

  1. I've always found the stories of graduate faculty routinely not reading seminar papers quite remarkable. (I understand that even the best of us occasionally forget things and need pestering).

    A modest proposal: departments require from seminar instructors written documentation that their paper marking is complete, and do not assign seminars to those instructors with outstanding documentation.

    —–
    KEYWORDS:
    Primary Blog

Designed with WordPress