Back in 2007, with reader comments as well.
If one is genuinely uninterested in engaging with non-human interlocutors, it is unclear why one continues to do so—especially while…
News and views about philosophy, the academic profession, academic freedom, intellectual culture, and other topics. The world’s most popular philosophy blog, since 2003.
If one is genuinely uninterested in engaging with non-human interlocutors, it is unclear why one continues to do so—especially while…
Maybe people are more interested in engaging with human interlocutors than with machine ones, no matter what the argument.
Essays as coursework has never been just about engaging the argument itself. Authorship matters because it matters that the argument…
If anything, this exchange illustrates the problem: judgments are being made on stylistic impressions (“this sounds like AI”) rather than…
The existential threat is not to higher-ed as such but a particular (and now common) higher-ed business model: the one…
I think Paul is absolutely right. For the humanities it is an existential crisis, not just some minor issue that…
Is the joke here that your comment is very obviously written by AI?
Back in 2007, with reader comments as well.
Dear Professor Leiter,
It seems that the website from which most of these “blasts from the past” are taken has been taken off the web, and their content cannot be accessed via the links on this website. As I am currently in the process of PHD admissions in philosophy, I would very much love to access this post and other advice regarding the various aspects of the admissions process. Your input specifically would be especially interesting as the University of Chicago is a top choice for me. I was thus wondering whether posts on this subject are perhaps available in some other medium?
Thanks in advance,
Noam Goldstein (MA student in the Philosophy department at Tel Aviv University)
[…] Goldstein on Blast from the past: Advice on “personal statements” for PhD admissionsOctober 12, […]
Leave a Reply