Leiter Reports: A Philosophy Blog

News and views about philosophy, the academic profession, academic freedom, intellectual culture, and other topics. The world’s most popular philosophy blog, since 2003.

  1. Thomas J Fournier's avatar
  2. Bernard W. Kobes's avatar
  3. Charles Pigden's avatar

    Alan Musgrave: Life and Work We mourn the death of Emeritus Professor Alan Musgrave (1940-2026) who will be remembered as…

  4. Agreed's avatar
  5. New Era?'s avatar
  6. Matt Lister's avatar
  7. Henry Clarke (acquisition editor, OUP)'s avatar

    Professor Halbach raises three concerns. One is about the availability of PDFs of OUP monographs. Another is about version discrepancies…

In Memoriam: William W. Tait (1929-2024)

Professor Tait, a leading figure in philosophy of mathematics, was emeritus at the University of Chicago, where he taught for nearly a quarter-century.  Matt Boyle, Chair of the Department here, kindly shared a memorial notice, that is below the fold.  Comments are also open for remembrances from those who knew Professor Tait or for those who would like to comment on the significance of his work.  (Memorial notice follows.)

William W. Tait, one of the most distinguished philosophers of mathematics in the second half of the 20th century, died at home in Hyde Park on March 15, at the age of 95.

Bill began teaching at the University from Chicago in 1972, retiring in 1996.  After retirement, he remained active in his research, including giving the prestigious Scholem Lectures and Tarski Lectures.  He was a central figure in a group of faculty—including David Malament, Howard Stein, Ian Mueller, Bill Wimsatt, and Leonard Linsky—who made Chicago the place to study the philosophy and history of physics and mathematics, logic, biology, and figures like Frege and Russell,  Earlier, he taught at Stanford University (1958-64), the University of Illinois-Chicago (1965-71), and Aarhus University (1971-72).  He was Philosophy Department chair from 1981 to 1987.  In 2002, he was elected as a Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences

Bill was a central contributor to the development of proof theory, and so also to logic and the philosophy of mathematics.  In his early years he provided an original study of functionals of transfinite type, with results that later also found applications in combinatory logic and the lambda calculus.  Later, Bill moved to considering the philosophical aspects of the constructivist means used in such work.  A well-known outcome was his article “Finitism” (1981), in which he argued for an understanding of Hilbertian finitism in terms of primitive recursive arithmetic.  Bill also wrote important historical-philosophical studies of main figures in logic and the philosophy of mathematics, most notably Georg Cantor, Ernst Zermelo, and Kurt Gödel.  He was the author of The Provenance of Pure Reason: Essays in the Philosophy of Mathematics and Its History (2005) and the editor of Early Analytic Philosophy: Frege, Russell, Wittgenstein (1996).

Bill was an avid climber, a marvelous colleague, and always had a twinkle in his eye.  But his sweetness was coupled with a fierce moral determination that made him, as Chair, a lion on behalf of the department and its faculty and a colossal pain to the administration.  

Bill and recently deceased Professor of Philosophy Howard Stein were great friends and Philosophy Department colleagues for decades.  They were born one day apart and died within a week of each other.

Leave a Reply to V. Alan White Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

9 responses to “In Memoriam: William W. Tait (1929-2024)”

  1. Bill was my dissertation advisor 40 years ago. While going over my dissertation line by line he said "don't write so you'll be understood; write so you can't be misunderstood." That was painful at the time but has served me well over the decades. One story of many. I didn't observe this myself, but this is too good not to tell. I hope someone who was there can confirm this. Bill had a hearing problem and occsaionally used a large old fashioned ear trumpet — the kind you see in cartoons. When he was chair in meetings he used the trumpet to listen, and when he thought someone was talking too long he would put the trumpet down. Bill was a wonderful advisor and philosopher. May he Rest In Peace.

  2. Hi Steve, I can't directly confirm the story about the ear trumpet in the department meetings. But I remember Bill telling me that he had had a doctor's appointment at which the doctor did something to remove a buildup of wax in Bill's ears. Bill said that on the way back to Hyde Park on public transit he found himself getting irritated and angry with everyone around him, and he resolved never to have his access to reality unblocked in that way again.

    Bill was one of the people I learned most from in grad school, both technical things in logic and set theory and a more general attitude. Although his PhD was in philosophy and he had always been in philosophy departments, his training was in mathematical logic, and I think for a long time he worked only on that and on philosophical reflections closely connected with it. While he probably said different things about this to different people, I remember him telling me that he first got interested in philosophy more broadly–first Wittgenstein, then a stop at Kant, then back to Plato–when he had to be chairman (of the philosophy department, of course), and therefore didn't have time to *work*: there was a strict opposition between real work and philosophy.

    Bill took an amateur's approach to Plato (and was no doubt tempted to overassimilate him to Wittgenstein, and to regard him as mainly a philosopher of mathematics), but I appreciated it. I was only in two ancient philosophy courses in grad school (one I audited with Mueller, one I where I took an incomplete with Adkins), and none at all as an undergrad, but for maybe five quarters in a row I was in a Plato reading group with Bill and a bunch of students including Steve Engstrom, and occasionally another professor or two, reading the Sophist, Philebus and Timaeus. Bill was a professor and most of us were grad students, but Bill didn't pretend to be teaching us, we were all about equally ignorant, just hacking through the texts together trying to figure out what might be going on in them. I think I learned more about (what eventually became) my field in that reading group than I would have in any courses in the field, and certainly I was exposed to much less of the stultifying dogma of those days (the late Plato giving up on the Forms and so on) than I would have been in a proper "education." I'm very grateful to Bill for opening up that space, and for showing that you're never too old to learn new ways of thinking.

    Then there's the story about the CBRF, but perhaps that's for another day.

  3. Dear Stephen, thanks for the interesting comment. I’ve always been impressed that logicians as talented as Kripke, Urquhart and Gaifman dedicate so much time to studying Frege, Russell, and Wittgenstein. Others, like Barwise and Friedman, seem to think of philosophy as intellectual throat clearing that is best done in private. Tait seems like an intermediate case, who thought that philosophy was worth publishing but, apparently, not “real work.” Another interesting case is Putnam, who dedicated most of his life to philosophy but, in correspondence, referred to his work with Martin Davis as “my most important work.”

  4. I did not know him but I thank the commentators for these wonderful thoroughly humanizing anecdotes. Great tributes I can empathize with.

  5. I was Bill’s partner for 40 years and I am the bestower of the ear trumpet, which I found at an antiques shop. He loved it and enjoyed jokingly using it to signal when someone talking had said more than enough at department meetings.

  6. Deepest condolences.

  7. Richard Zach has a very good obituary (https://richardzach.org/2024/03/w-w-tait-1929-2024/) focused mainly on Bill’s contributions to logic, with a fantastic old photo, and I have a little reminiscence (https://awcarus.com/2024/03/bill-tait-1929-2024/), to which Steve Awodey has now added a bit as well. Bill was on my committee, two-thirds of which just died in the past couple of weeks. I'm also very grateful to him for having brought me into the philosophy department in the first place; he was the contact I was referred to when I approached the dept during the summer; he smoothed my path, was very welcoming in every way, and then also became my initial supervisor when I planned to work on Cantor and Russell. And didn't mind at all when I drifted over to working on Carnap with Howard instead, stayed on the committee — and hosted a party after my viva (knowing Howard well enough to know he wouldn't), many years later.

  8. In this interview, Professor Tait discusses his attitude to philosophy:

    https://home.uchicago.edu/~wwtx/fivequestions%20copy.pdf

  9. Michael N. Forster

    It was with great sadness that I learned of the recent passing of William Tait (“Bill”). Bill, who was serving as Chair of the Philosophy Department at the time, was the first person I got to know when I came to the University of Chicago in 1984/5. He was a first-rate logician and philosopher of mathematics who also had broader philosophical interests, especially Wittgenstein. He embodied the noblest political and ethical principles, including principles of democracy and liberalism both at a general level and at the more local level of the Department. He was also a loyal and warm friend, blessed with a fine sense of humor. Like many other people, I benefited enormously from all of these virtues when I came to Chicago and in ways that are much too numerous to relate here. But one anecdote may perhaps serve to give at least some impression of Bill’s stalwart defense of the interests of everyone in the Department and of his sense of humor: The Department had received a gift from a generous donor to be used in support of its graduate students. At a certain point during his chairmanship, Bill received a rather officious letter from a lower-level administrator in the University informing him that these funds would no longer be available to the Department because they were being “CBRF’d.” In his reply (which I had the privilege of reading when I took over as Chair) Bill wrote that he did not know what “CBRF’d” meant but that he strongly suspected that the “CBR” stood for “crudely but royally” and that it was not the funds that were being “CBRF’d” but the Department. Like many other former colleagues and students, I will always remember Bill with the greatest admiration, gratitude, and fondness.

    —–
    KEYWORDS:
    Primary Blog

Designed with WordPress