News and views about philosophy, the academic profession, academic freedom, intellectual culture, and other topics. The world’s most popular philosophy blog, since 2003.
I would note that there are a lot of structural reasons why senior staff might produce less research than people…
There is a slippery inference from the premise that we have struggled to converge on important philosophical truths to the…
I can corroborate Jason’s remarks about the UW System’s implementation of post-tenure review. In part because I was a participant…
The Wisconsin legislature made UW system implement post-tenure (5-year) reviews several years ago. The statutory requirements were fed into the…
Sorry, this may be a bit off topic, but if done well, I would really welcome some equivalent of a…
Isn’t one of the problems in this interesting converation how we define “philosophy”? Is philosophy just what is taught and…
I don’t think I misread the paper. Its lament is clear. (It’s a good paper, in style and substance, even…
…has been published by the American Journal of Jurisprudence, which has made it open access (hurrah!). The most useful point the essay makes, which is certainly right, is that judges rely on what Dworkin called "policy" considerations in deciding cases, contrary to Dworkin. Hart was really very tolerant of Dworkin's fabrications!
(Thanks to Jeff Pojanowski for the pointer.)
Leave a Reply