News and views about philosophy, the academic profession, academic freedom, intellectual culture, and other topics. The world’s most popular philosophy blog, since 2003.
It’s a very impressive book. I’m more positive than Robin because of the scholarly breadth and depth of Beckert’s research.…
This looks like it was generated by A.I.
The image next to Wittgenstein is actually John Turturro saying ‘If pasta could talk, I’d understand it’.–On a lighter note:…
Although the hack occurred with less than 24 hours before our grades were due, our provost sent a pointless email…
And the image of eyeglasses in the linguistic turn panel are not eyeglasses. (oh wait, I thought we were playing…
Like the image next to Kripke’s name, that is in fact not an image of G. E. Moore, either.
The image next to Quine is not Quine, either, although at least it bears some resemblance to him, unlike the…
I came across this chart on FB, and it’s not a bad description of analytic philosophy when it existed (except, of course, the image next to Kripke is not Kripke!):
Thanks. Great introduction for a lay beginner.
The image next to Quine is not Quine, either, although at least it bears some resemblance to him, unlike the Kripke-image and Kripke.
Like the image next to Kripke’s name, that is in fact not an image of G. E. Moore, either.
And the image of eyeglasses in the linguistic turn panel are not eyeglasses. (oh wait, I thought we were playing at being Magritte.)
The image next to Wittgenstein is actually John Turturro saying ‘If pasta could talk, I’d understand it’.–On a lighter note: has there ever been a more wrong-headed and self-impoverishing intellectual move than the linguistic turn? Asking for Peirce, Husserl, Bergson, Whitehead, Lukács, Dewey, and Merleau-Ponty.
This looks like it was generated by A.I.
Leave a Reply