The PGR editors, Professors Kar and Pynes, tell me the plan is to do a new set of PGR surveys in fall 2027 (the last report was for 2024-25). I’ve been tracking faculty moves since then (see this post and follow the links therein).
I know from email correspondence that students are very interested in a new set of rankings. For students applying PhD programs this fall, this is the advice I give to students I work with about how to think about the relative “overall” strength of PhD programs. I always tell students not to obsess too much about the ordinal ranking; to that end, I’d look at the hierarchy of strength of programs this coming year in terms of “clusters” of peer programs, i.e., , choose among them based on your interests, financial aid, and personal considerations. It can also make good sense to choose a program that is in the next peer cluster below if that program is a particularly good fit for your specialized interests. And in certain very specialized areas (like logic, philosophy of science, or scholarship in the post-Kantian Continental traditions) it can make sense to choose a program in a much lower cluster if you are sure about your interests.
I’ll update this with some additional thoughts on the “specialty” rankings since 2024.
So taking account of the faculty moves and retirements (plus the 2024 PGR survey results, including the fact that HPS was wrongly omitted from the Indiana faculty in 2024, plus–at the margins–the quality of job placement), here is my best guesstimate for the broad “peer” groupings in 2026-27:
Group 1 (1-11)
Harvard University
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
New York University
Princeton University
Rutgers University, New Brunswick
University of California, Berkeley
University of California, Los Angeles
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
University of Pittsburgh (Philosophy & HPS)
University of Southern California
Yale University
Group 2 (12-22)
City University of New York Graduate Center
Columbia University
Cornell University
Johns Hopkins University
Stanford University
University of California, Irvine (Philosophy & LPS)
University of California, San Diego
University of Chicago
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
University of Notre Dame
University of Texas, Austin
Group 3 (23-36)
Brown University
Duke University
Indiana University, Bloomington (Philosophy & HPS)
Northwestern University
Ohio State University
University of Arizona
University of California, Riverside
University of Colorado, Boulder
University of Maryland, College Park
University of Massachusetts, Amherst
University of Pennsylvania
University of Virginia
University of Wisconsin, Madison
Washington University, St. Louis
Group 4 (37-51)
Boston University
Carnegie-Mellon University
Florida State University
Georgetown University
Purdue University
Rice University
Syracuse University
University of California, Davis
University of California, Santa Barbara
University of Connecticut, Storrs
University of Illinois, Chicago
University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
University of Miami
University of Minnesota, Twin Cities
University of Rochester
Outside the U.S.
Group 1: Oxford University, University of Toronto
Group 2: Australian National University, Cambridge University
Group 3: King’s College, London, London School of Economics, University College London, University of Bristol, University of British Columbia, University of Edinburgh, University of Leeds, University of St Andrews/University of Stirling Joint Program, University of Sydney, University of Warwick.
Group 4: McGill University; Monash University; National University of Singapore; University of Birmingham; University of Durham; University of Glasgow; University of Melbourne; University of Sheffield; University of Western Ontario; University of York; York University, Toronto.



I would note that there are a lot of structural reasons why senior staff might produce less research than people…