MOVING TO FRONT FROM JULY 16–SEE UPDATE (AND COMMENTS NOW OPEN FOR FURTHER PERSPECTIVES)

Shame on Yale for participating in this–surely they could have leveraged their reputation to get the authoritarian capitalists who run Singapore to lighten up on this–but I guess they didn't make a credible threat not to participate at all if political speech were not permitted on campus.  Perhaps this says something about Yale's priorities.  What an embarrassment.

(Thanks to Matt Shafer for the pointer.)

UPDATE:  Axel Gelfert, a philosopher at the National University of Singapore, writes:

I noticed your link to the WSJ article on Yale-NUS's 'ban' on political speech, and just for balance I thought I'd point out that this does not reflect the experience of politically active Singaporean students here.  See for example this interview with student activist Bernard Chen: http://kentridgecommon.com/?p=10461 

It is true that foreigners are not allowed to participate in party-political activities — which, to be sure, is a more extreme restriction than, say, the United States's ban on party-political campaign donations from foreigners. But there is a robust amount of political speech at NUS — not least thanks to the NUS Political Association ( http://www.nuspa.org/ ), the NUS Democratic Socialist Club (another University-recognized society), and the various Departments and Colleges. I've attended events on such topics as immigration, abortion, the Middle East, and freedom of speech, during which the debate lacked none of the vigour found at European or American university campuses.

While I have my own misgivings about how certain things are run in Singapore, I am somewhat taken aback by the amount of vitriol coming from a small number of people at Yale; clearly, they are more upset about how the Yale Corporation did not consult with the Yale College when railroading through the decision to start a joint campus in Singapore — but this is hardly the fault of NUS (or even the Singapore government). Much of the criticism was not well-informed at all (e.g., specific political books were said to be 'banned' that are freely available in NUS's University Library — don't Yale staff know how to do an online search of a library catalogue?) and quite self-serving — I'm pretty sure NUS has contributed more to liberalization and social mobility in the last 20 years than Yale during the same period…