Leiter Reports: A Philosophy Blog

News and views about philosophy, the academic profession, academic freedom, intellectual culture, and other topics. The world’s most popular philosophy blog, since 2003.

  1. Fool's avatar
  2. Santa Monica's avatar
  3. Charles Bakker's avatar
  4. Matty Silverstein's avatar
  5. Jason's avatar
  6. Nathan Meyvis's avatar
  7. Stefan Sciaraffa's avatar

    The McMaster Department of Philosophy has now put together the following notice commemorating Barry: Barry Allen: A Philosophical Life Barry…

Best APA Letter Ever

A little over a year ago, I posted a sort of how-to for being married to a philosopher. It prompted Mark Bernstein to send along this incredibly funny letter to the editor from vol 62. of the APA Proceedings, written by his (then) wife Nancy Daley. He had this to say about the letter, " I'm biased, but I think it's the best letter ever published by the APA Proceedings."  

You should read the full letter at JSTOR. But, here are a few choice excerpts: 

I was in my late twenties, just finishing a Bachelor’s degree in English, when the prospect of marrying a philosopher first materialized. I recall with vivid clarity that autumn afternoon in my poetry professor’s dormered office when I announced I had finally decided to marry Mark. Without even lifting his gaze from his cluttered desk, Mr. Conner announced. "Well. You’ll never win an argument.”

This. Oh, for the love of all that's holy, this. 

And lest you think philosophy is the only topic open to interminable discussion, I will mention only in passing a certain night I spent on a sofa in Princeton listening to Mark and his friend, Stewart [Stew Cohen], analyzing the apparently unforgivable syntax of a passage in the Toyota Owner’s Manual on the topic of downshifting.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

2 responses to “Best APA Letter Ever”

  1. I have known Mark and Stewart for almost 40 years now (we were grad students together), and I can state with near Cartesian certainty that they could indeed go on interminably about the "apparently unforgivable syntax" of the assembly instructions provided with an Ikea desk. Of course, so could I.

  2. I have no doubt that you could and would. Didn't I witness a morning following an, ahem, extensive discussion of choosing Door Number One versus Door Number Two if you knew or didn't know what was behind Door Number Three? I welcomed you into the house that morning and your first words were either a confirmation or a correction of whatever you had asserted the night before?

    You guys!

    —–
    KEYWORDS:
    Primary Blog

Designed with WordPress