Leiter Reports: A Philosophy Blog

News and views about philosophy, the academic profession, academic freedom, intellectual culture, and other topics. The world’s most popular philosophy blog, since 2003.

  1. Fool's avatar
  2. Santa Monica's avatar
  3. Charles Bakker's avatar
  4. Matty Silverstein's avatar
  5. Jason's avatar
  6. Nathan Meyvis's avatar
  7. Stefan Sciaraffa's avatar

    The McMaster Department of Philosophy has now put together the following notice commemorating Barry: Barry Allen: A Philosophical Life Barry…

What is the mood of a philosophical argument?

A film has a mood, a story has a mood. What is the mood of philosophy? What is the beauty in a particular argument, its grotesqueness, its tensions, and resolution, and what does that mood sound like?

This is an odd question, but for Hi-Phi Nation, I had to assume that these questions had answers, and I had to answer them. That's because a good sound-rich piece of audio production has music, sound-tracking, and sound design in general, and that's the show that I wanted to make for philosophy, which has a lot of other wonderful alternative forms of audio, like Philosophy Bites, Philosophy Talk, Elucidations, History of Philosophy without any Gaps, and so forth. Story-driven audio has an emotion and aesthetic component that you might not notice just like you might fail to notice sound design in film when you are completely engrossed in it, but when you watch a film without a soundtrack, its isn't a coherent experience. And when you're trying to do story-driven audio for philosophy, you're left with this odd, almost category-mistake of a question. But it isn't a category mistake, and it turns out there are good and bad answers to it, though I will spare you the bad answers in this post.
 
One note about soundtracking for podcasting; I had to rely on the corpus of open licensed music available for podcasts due to the outdated laws concerning copyright in this country, and my own limitations as a musician (I'm not going to compose and score the thing!). Given these constraints, at the end of a particular edit of an episode, I have to think long and hard about the mood of a piece of philosophy. These are two decisions I made from Episode 3 too illustrate, which features a discussion of revisionist just war theory with Jeff McMahan, Helen Frowe, Major Ian Fishback, and others.
 
This little clip from a piece by musician Jason Staczek is the most used piece in this season of Hi-Phi Nation. I just love it for philosophy. Its a perfect mix of wonder and puzzlement.

Cheap SuitSample

Here is where I use it to explain a famous thought experiment from revisionist just war theory, followed by a statement of the conclusion by Helen Frowe.

RevisionismThoughtExperimentFrowe

The following piece by the group Blue Dot Sessions, who create so much of the music that podcast producers are using these days because they're open-licensed, is one I put in the folder of "nicely moves the discussion along." There is a kind of tension I want to create in the presentation of certain philosophical views I think are deserving of tension and anticipation, rather than reflective contemplation. I love this piece for that purpose, and use it a lot in other episodes.

Here is how I use it to draw out one of the most objectionable consequences of Jeff McMahan's revisionist just war theory.

RevisionismSegmentMcMahan

Scoring and soundtracking has been one of the most pleasing surprises in this project. I definitely do not want to farm it out in the future. If you're a philosopher, I'd be curious to know what the soundtrack you think is to your work.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

One response to “What is the mood of a philosophical argument?”

  1. The music for my own work, if I had my druthers, is Four Last Songs, by Richard Stauss, as sung by Jessye Norman.

    Thanks for the run-down of your labors for Hi-Phi Nation–very impressive! I identify with some of the work from my own 20-year + efforts on my Philosophy Songs parody site (just click my name and steel your ears). Although I had written lyrics for parodies since back in grad school at UT–Knoxville in the late 70s, I only got into the work of using converted non-copyrighted MIDIs to back my own vocals in the mid-90s. I used an early version PC multi-track mixer for many years with not-the-best audio cards or mics, and most of my recordings were first-takes after a few rehearsals. I did complex multi-tracks on some songs though, such as my "Good Inductions", sung to The Beach Boys' "Good Vibrations", dedicated to Alan Hajek, which took 27 different tracks to get at least an approximation of the four-voice harmonies. I recall that recording took around 40 hours of work. (Of course I have never received a penny for any of this–in spite of the dubious quality of the results I actually just loved doing parodies.) The recordings are admittedly mostly pretty crude–but I learned a lot about how much work it takes to produce anything like a tolerable MP3 product. Your work is much, much more polished and professional, and you should be very proud.

    My own proudest moment came when I traveled from my own outlying UW campus to Madison to hear David Chalmers give a talk many years ago after the sensation of The Conscious Mind. During his break I walked up and put out my hand and he said "You're the guy with the songs, right?" For that unexpected compliment I then composed "Two Sides Now" for him, sung of course most famously by Judy Collins as composed by Joni Mitchell.

    Your work is exceptionally good, unlike my amateur stabs, but at least I can dimly appreciate the labor you put into it. Thank you for it.

    —–
    KEYWORDS:
    Primary Blog

Designed with WordPress