Leiter Reports: A Philosophy Blog

News and views about philosophy, the academic profession, academic freedom, intellectual culture, and other topics. The world’s most popular philosophy blog, since 2003.

  1. André Hampshire's avatar

    Sagar’s claim that LLMs pose an “existential threat” to universities rests on a set of conflations that do not survive…

  2. Edwin Fruehwald's avatar

    Generative AI has the potential to do catastrophic harm to higher education. This is because learning is a biological process…

  3. Anonymous1's avatar

    When the problem of AI-based papers started a few years ago, I immediately switched to in-class essay exams and told…

  5. V. Alan White's avatar
  6. Kenneth Pike's avatar

    In terms of pedagogy, I agree with Professor Sagar. In philosophy courses, at least, the exercise is the point; I…

  7. AG Tanyi's avatar

    The central claim is that LLMs (or AI more generally, I suppose) is an existential threat to universities. This gets…

Threats to academic freedom in Australia from Chinese pressure

Brian Leiter

This is a striking set of stories that bode ill for core academic freedom in Australian universities.   Too many Australian universities are already struggling with mindless bureaucrats micro-managing university life; add to that the need for Chinese tuition dollars, and it's a dangerous mix of incentives.   Curious to hear from others "on the ground" there about what's going on, so comments are open.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

One response to “Threats to academic freedom in Australia from Chinese pressure”

  1. Dirk Baltzly

    There's a further wrinkle to this story. An Australian academic (and member of a prominent left think-tank) claims that Allen & Unwin have delayed publication of his book out of fear of Chinese govt retaliation. Prof. Clive Hamilton was unwilling to wait and the rights to the book have been returned to him. A&U were cautious claiming that they are 'awaiting clarification concerning matters before the courts' at the moment. Hamilton claims that legal has been all over the manuscript to remove anything defamatory, so there can be no rational basis for fearing legal action. Who knows where the truth lies. But if indeed a publisher has caved to pressure, this seems far more worrying than the episodes discussed in the NY Times article.

    Story on the ABC website here http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-11-13/academic-claims-hes-been-silenced-by-chinese-government/9142694

    —–
    KEYWORDS:
    Primary Blog

    Reply

Designed with WordPress