…since of course testing so far has been far too limited to ascertain that. Let's hope they do this right, unlike almost everything else so far.
To be worth using, a detector needs not only (A) not get very many false positives, but also (B) get…
News and views about philosophy, the academic profession, academic freedom, intellectual culture, and other topics. The world’s most popular philosophy blog, since 2003.
To be worth using, a detector needs not only (A) not get very many false positives, but also (B) get…
Everything you say is true, but what is the alternative? I don’t think people are advocating a return to in-class…
The discussion here assumes an institutional context where returning to supervised in-person assessment is at least theoretically feasible, a reasonable…
Cyber security professional here -reliably determining when a computational artifact (file, etc.) was created is *hard*. This is sorta why…
Agreed with the other commentator. It is extremely unlikely that Pangram’s success is due to its cheating by reading metadata.
I see this question as a bit naïve. There is metadata on every document created by a modern word processor…
There’s a simple way to test. Open a pre-2022 essay and copy-and-paste it into a new file.
…since of course testing so far has been far too limited to ascertain that. Let's hope they do this right, unlike almost everything else so far.
Better still, these are serum studies and the first has already begun. This mean we have antibodies already, at least in limited quantities. Last I heard we were still in "real soon now" mode. These are important because people can be released from quarantine based on these test.
—–
KEYWORDS:
Primary Blog
Leave a Reply to Robert Lee Cancel reply